More Reviews
REVIEWS Resident Evil: Revelations Review
While 3DS gamers have been enjoying the franchise's best game in years for some time now, does the experience translate for Resident Evil fans on console?

Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D Review
Gamers have gone bananas for Nintendo's 3DS, but can this port of Retro Studios' 2010 Wii game make the jump to your portable?
More Previews
PREVIEWS The Last of Us Preview
With Naughty Dog releasing a new IP in just a few short weeks, we got hands-on one more time. But don't worry: This is a spoiler-free preview.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES GRiD 2
Release date: 05/28/13

Fuse
Release date: 05/28/13

Remember Me
Release date: 06/04/13

The Last of Us
Release date: 06/14/13


LATEST FEATURES Being A Console Is Actually Xbox One's Worst Asset
Microsoft's newest console has lots of different features, but video games might hold the device back from the software giant's true intentions.

Everything I Learned About Call of Duty: Ghosts Last Week
I wasn't allowed to talk about the new Infinity Ward game last week when I met with Activision, and I don't have much to say now that Xbox One spilled the beans.
 
Coming Soon

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP Bras
On the future of some gamers
By Bras
Posted on 05/22/13
Before Microsoft and Sony do something regarding their future in the video game business, I wanted to write, and I've wanted it for a long time now, but other things kept getting in my way, and fearing that tomorrow might be too late, today will have to do.  ...

MEMBER BLOG

EstvenSregorii EstvenSregorii's Blog
PROFILE
Average Blog Rating:
[ Back to All Posts ]
The gaming industry.
Posted on Monday, September 5 2011 @ 12:44:17 Eastern

You'll have to forgive me, Gamerevolution readers.

I've just had a long talk with a friend of mind and I'm feeling very opinionated. So the structure of thisblog is going to suck a big one. Hopefully it'll get my message across and I'll be able to sort it out later. Where to s tart, where to start.

The gaming industry as a whole has started to disappoint me. I say started because it has only been very recently where a few unsavory characters have begun to ruin it for the rest of us. No, I'm not talking about thePplaystation network fiasco or any of those hacking bits that everybody harps on about. Nobody was hurt there. Those were men like me. Those were faceless masses that were striking back against an industry that is slowly chiseling away at our soul.

DRM. Digital rights management. I swear to god I am going to go back in time and strangle the man who thought this was a good idea. It's gotten to the point where we are no longer paying for games. We're paying for the right to play them. The CD is nothign but fluff. It's a reminder of things that used to be but are now lost. It's frustrating to pop in a CD (We will for the sake of argument use DEUS EX as an example) only to have steam bot up and ask me if I wanted to install it. For me, this is a big resounding yes. But for somebody who doesn't have Steam, or for that matter doesn't have an internet connection; they just got ****ed big time. I just put a CD into my computer, and there are no files on the CD save for a runtime that tells Steam to wake itself up and get to work. 

It's terrible, really. The way things are headed. That's just the tamest of examples. Ubisoft loves to screw its gamers coming and going. They love to lord their networks over our heads and remind us that we're playing their game. They like to tell us that we don't have a connection even when we do, and they love to boot us out of Assassins' Creed or Splinter Cell just because I'm running programs in the background. It's not as bad as it was, but it's still pretty awful all things considered. The fact that these companies can essentially kick us in the crotch for PAYING for their games is insulting. Why should I bother spending money on stuff you're just going to punish me with later? It makes no sense. Yes, pirating is a problem. Yes, it should be stopped. But you're not going to stop it by demanding that we attach a DNA signature to an installer.

It used to be EA was pretty good about this. If I bought a new copy of the Sims 3, I was entitled to a few bonus points and a free download. All good. In fact, Mass Effect 2 did this too. They rewarded me, the purchaser of the product with free stuff because I didn't download their games illegally. That's great. That's fantastic. More power to EA. But by the same token, they're testing my patience by doing something else I loathe. Offering an incomplete product.

It's not just the Sims they do it with. Practically every game that comes out of their doors will inevitably function as a money funnel. When I purchased the Sims 3, I knew what I was getting into. Inevitably more Sims games will come out and in a desperate bid not to be left behind I will purchase them. Whoopee. My question to EA is WHY. Why do you do this to me? Why do you sell me a shell of a game and then fill it out later with content. Why do you make me pay for it even though I already proved my loyalty by not pirating one of the most downloaded games on Demonoid? C'mon, EA. Help me help you. I want to be on your side but you're making it hard.

Dragon Age was terrible about this. I was smack dab in the middle of my party camp clicking around and having fun. I was enjoying Dragon Age because it was a throw-back to the games I used to play as a kid. I loved every second of it until I was bombarded IN GAME by an advertisement. A man walked up to me and demanded that I abide by Duncan's promise to save some keep in an ancient section of Fereldan. Cool. Love that ****, sign me up. Then, the bastard proceeds to tell me I can purchase downloadable content via the in-game store. I exploded and hurled my keyboard through a wall.

WHY is that acceptable? WHY can Bioware or EA or whoever shove themselves into my game and remind me I'm not done PAYING for **** yet? The whole state of DLCs disgust me! When I go to the store I don't ask for a cake and expect thirty percent of a cake!

I expect a whole goddamn cake.

Mass Effect 2  gave you whole worlds to explore. It introduced new gameplay elements and new characters and new EVERYTHING if I could just find it in my heart to shell out enough cash. God. GOD.

DLCs and DRMs and vegetable soups aside. There's one thing that really grinds my gears. It irks me to see the direction games are heading. Yes, we've all noticed it. But it's gotten terrible of late. I pop in Dragon Age, I get a decent RPG. It's deep, it's frustrating, but overall it's a fun experience. I slide in Dragon Age 2, and I get--- I don't know what. I get Dynasty Warriors with a fresh coat of paint. Game companies do this to bring in new audiences. They want to branch out. They want to grab the guys that play Call of Duty and don't understand how to balance a character or trick him out with awesome equipment. Sure, yeah. I get that. But you're forgetting about us. You're forgetting about the guys that got you to where you are in the first place.

Even developers I love are doing it. Valve has all but abandoned the Half Life franchise. I haven't seen news on that front in a long time. But sure enough, Team Fortress 2 has gone free to play. Portal 2 is coming out and have I SEEN the robot dancing animations I can buy in the in-game store? Defense of the Ancients, Counter Strike. I'm seeing a lot of names but I'm not seeing ANYTHING that tells me they still care.

On the whole the gaming industry has become something I can't stand. It's no longer about the fun of it. It's no longer about pushing the bounds of what machines are capable of. It's no longer about stories or gripping narratives or anything like that.

It's how much money we can squeeze out of the kids stupid enough to buy our games the first time.

I'll sort through this later, but it's good to get some of this off my chest. I love you.
Comments
  • tinymhg
    tinymhg

    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posted: Sep 5th, 2011 at 5:10 pm
    First DRM sucks! As does dumbing down an RPG so a more general audience will play it. Yet I am forced to disagree with your views on DLC. You say: “The whole state of DLCs disgust me! When I go to the store I don't ask for a cake and expect thirty percent of a cake!” Well, I think your analogy is bad. It’s more like buying a car with no options package than it is buying a cake. You buy a car with only a standard equipment package it still runs, it’s street legal, all the safety features are in place, and you won’t die without the fancy upgrades. DLC are nothing but add-on’s that you can live without, don’t believe me I have two words for you: Horse Armor. Horse Armor DLC for TES IV: Oblivion is the silliest and most unneeded DLC ever created. You also wrote: “More power to EA. But by the same token, they're testing my patience by doing something else I loathe. Offering an incomplete product.” Funny PC gamers have had something called Expansion Packs since the 1980’s, and most have been welcomed by the fans of the game. DLC and Expansion Packs are additional content the game itself is complete or it wouldn’t work. In game advertising what a bunch bullsh*t, that would piss me off too.
  • WILLS_COOL_MODE
    WILLS_COOL_MODE

    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posted: Sep 5th, 2011 at 6:07 pm
    The difference is though, expansion packs substantially added to the game. Look at Opposing Force for example. It added an entire campaign with a story that complimented the original, a ton of new weapons and enemies, interesting locations, and even expanded the coding for friendly characters. Now let's looks at say, Mass Effect 2 or Alan Wake. If you don't have the final missions payed for in these games, the story is literally not complete. In Mass Effect 2 it's even worse because there is a sequel whose events rely on something that happened in a DLC mission. It's ridiculous.
  • tinymhg
    tinymhg

    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posted: Sep 6th, 2011 at 12:04 am
    Well, I have never played either Mass Effect 2 or Alan Wake, so I have no firsthand knowledge of whether you are right or not, so I will assume you are correct in your assertion. Even so it does not change the fact that DLC and Expansion Packs are add-on’s, additional content that may leave a hole in the story if not paid for and played. The same argument could be used to condemn sequels, the story is literally not complete unless you buy and play the sequel. Most DLC are broken up Expansion Packs, sort of like a watermelon, Expansion Packs are the whole melon and DLC are the slices. DLC are nothing but add-on’s that you can live without, you may not be happy, but it won’t kill you to do without one.
  • WILLS_COOL_MODE
    WILLS_COOL_MODE

    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posted: Sep 6th, 2011 at 5:53 pm
    But the story of the game you just played is complete. A sequel, if the developers aren't completely retarded, is a NEW story that relates to the old one. The only example I can think of where this isn't true is Halo 2, and that game had the worst ending I've ever seen so what does that tell you.
  • Mixer
    Mixer

    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posted: Sep 5th, 2011 at 6:31 pm
    Let's say you use Firefox and the addition called NoScript. Now, take a peek at the names that want access to just this page! Yea, DRM sux, so do the control freaks and we are the guilty for letting them run amok. Wanna stop it? Start a movement: for one month buy ZERO games, plays, musaks, etc.. For the interim, go ebay and pickup Neverhood (and Xcom 2 that apparently GR has never heard tell). Fetch and install D-Fend Reloaded. Set D-fend to Xcom2 and Neverhood and have fun for a month w/o the insult of the current idiocy of the gaming bean freaks.
  • cyberjim2000
    cyberjim2000

    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posted: Sep 5th, 2011 at 7:25 pm
    X-Com 2... You mean Terror of the Deep? The first game is fun too. I agree with the blog. The industry as a whole has been going downhill but who's to blame? Personally, I blame us the consumer. Remember when Left 4 Dead 2 was schedule for release less than a year after the first game? Remember when there were threats of boycotts? Remember when the people who "boycotted" the game brought it anyways? I sure did. We consumers have officially become a joke. And don't forget about the $10 online pass that you have to pay to get online if you brought the game used. It maybe online today but it'll be content tomorrow until finally when buying a used game meant that you're buying a demo.
  • EstvenSregorii
    EstvenSregorii

    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posted: Sep 6th, 2011 at 8:07 am
    Well, this newest Sims expansion. Generations. Aside from a few objects it adds an extended teenage lifespan and the ability to woohoo in a shower. So in effect, I'm shelling out thirty bucks for something I feel they could have put in the vanilla game to begin with. No new places, no new gameplay elements. Just the ability to put hair on your Sims.
  • the_original_xy
    the_original_xy

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posted: Sep 6th, 2011 at 5:38 pm
    well the Sims is the ultimate example of a company bending customers over the table and violating them.
  • NecroWolf
    NecroWolf

    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posted: Sep 8th, 2011 at 10:38 am
    I've said it before and I'll say it again, DRM won't ever stop unless the pirates stop, and they won't. DRM will get worse, pirating will get worse to circumvent it and the cycle will continue. There is literally nothing we can do about it, but one thing confuses me. Are you complaining about DLC or DRM? It kind of started off on DRM, then it moved onto DLC. And if we are complaining about DLC, why are we complaining about DLC? It doesn't signify an incomplete game, The Sims 3 is a complete game, or are you saying you want everything for your money and no expansions? I'm just confused on the message here. That'd be like World of Warcraft launching with everything the x-packs have added, its no different in the Sims case or any other game. And, I liked Dragon Age 1, and 2, both for different reasons. Then again, I like any game I play, I'm not really a critical person, and I play dozens of titles a year. I don't believe in bad games, just different tastes (there are a few exceptions).
  • EstvenSregorii
    EstvenSregorii

    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posted: Sep 8th, 2011 at 3:23 pm
    It was sort of a rant. As I said I was just typing. No real structure. I complained for DRM a bit, and then I started on DLCs. And I feel without DLCs, many games would just be a vanilla experience. Whereas you get people that spend upwards of eighty, ninety bucks and their game is completely different from you. They can go to Japan while you're stuck in Saudi Arabia. Your game is empty by comparison.
  • WILLS_COOL_MODE
    WILLS_COOL_MODE

    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posted: Sep 8th, 2011 at 11:27 pm
    I don't think the first part of your comment is necessarily true. I know that back in the day the only time I pirated a game was when it was something you couldn't find anywhere, but now when it comes to PC games I'm pirating more often than not BECAUSE of DRM. I'd much rather have the version with no DRM and not deal with all the bullshit than pay for something that's going to be a pain in the ass.
  • NecroWolf
    NecroWolf

    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posted: Sep 8th, 2011 at 10:45 am
    Also, DLC has been around for a lot longer than most realize, Total Annihilation started it with micro transactions for new units.

Post a Comment
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this article.
 
More On GameRevolution