Ethics for Sale!comments powered by Disqus
Posted on Monday, September 16 2013 @ 17:19:38 PST
So, the GTA V review embargo is up. First I wish to discuss a badly written review, then I wish to discuss morally bankrupt reviews.
Universally positive reviews thus far (7:37 PM EST, 16/9/13) with but one exception and that review is...terrible...
It's from The Escapist (of course it is) and it has to be one of the most pretentious cases of missing the point that I've read in or of the medium since Jonathan Blow started blithering like an idiot about Citizen Kane, a movie I doubt he's ever watched. It's more pretentious than Cliffy B's incredibly ridiculous remarks about second-hand game sales. Here it is: Grand Theft Auto 5 Review - People Suck (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/reviews/10598-Grand-Theft-Auto-5-Review-People-Suck)
Alright...here's a basic checklist of bad review criteria for games. This doesn't consider the difference between merely competent and great reviews (which intelligently discuss thematic, conceptual, and integrational synthesis and can meaningfully relate how each of a game's elements comes together or fails to, or barring that, manages to exploit a bad game for cheap laughs) but sets a reasonable bar minimum for review writing
This is a reasonable set of standards. The Escapist review by Greg Tito fails all but one. In a review 12 paragraphs long Tito can't be bothered to discuss the game at all until paragraph six. So he does discuss the game for four paragraphs sandwiched between eight paragraphs of harangue about how he didn't like the protagonists and therefore the game was awful. Within the aforesaid harangue are some real whoppers about previous GTA games which indicate that either Tito never played them, and the inclusion of those statements are nothing more than puffery to fortify nonexistent credibility, or that he was seriously not paying attention. From Tito's review I only know two things, GTA V is apparently a technical marvel and lots of fun to play (he never says how or in what ways, those four paragraphs are vague and almost superfluous. It is impossible to get a good idea of how, for example, GTA V differs from previous entries in the series on a mechanical level from his review) but that the characters and setting are dreadful. At the very least paragraph two offers what is beyond a doubt the most inapt comparison this side of presidential election coverage.
On to topic number two, the inspiration for which I must credit to Slower than Slow, Thicker than Thick.
Here is the post - Grand Theft Auto V Review Ends Tomorrow (http://loltaku.tumblr.com/post/61378471321/gtav-review-embargo-ends-tomorrow-this-game-has)
Here is the Metacritic page for Grand Theft Auto V: Grand Theft Auto V for XBox 360 (http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/grand-theft-auto-v)
Look over those positive reviews and then examine the following:
The sound the present reader is not hearing, and cannot imagine, is their credibility as critical outlets vanishing.
Vikings: Wolves of Migard
Vikings Wolves of Migard features trailer. (1:32)
The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited
Return to Morrowind Gameplay Trailer. (1:50)
Berserk and the Band of the Hawk
Berserk and the Band of the Hawk launch trailer. (1:47)
Total War: Warhammer
Bretonia trailer. (2:17)
Motorhead through the ages gameplay trailer. (3:00)
|More On GameRevolution|