More Reviews
REVIEWS Screencheat Review
The first FPS in history where looking at your friends’ screens isn’t cheating; it’s a requirement.

Natural Doctrine Review
This actually might be "your dad's" Japanese TRPG, and for those with a hankering for it, that can be a very good thing.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Disney Fantasia: Music Evolved
Release date: Out Now

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Release date: 11/04/14

Far Cry 4
Release date: 11/18/14

Dragon Age: Inquisition
Release date: 11/18/14

LATEST FEATURES 7 Problems With Kingdom Hearts HD 2.5 ReMIX [Hands-on Preview]
For the last time, Aqua, NO I will not go out with you! (Yes, yes I will, actually.)

Xbox Downloads October 2014 - Updating Each Week
Microsoft's Xbox One console continues an Xbox Live revolution started over a decade ago. Here's hoping Summer of Arcade makes it to the platform next year.

Read More Member Blogs
I Don't Want to, but I Have To...
By oblivion437
Posted on 10/20/14
Well, Gamergate has spilled over into the mainstream media and the coverage appears to be nearly uniformly dreadful. Take " What is Gamergate, and What Does It Say About Gender In Video Games? " by David Konnow as an example.  It appears that the writer has done little to no...


oblivion437 oblivion437's Blog
Sarkeesian, Revisited
Posted on Saturday, August 24 2013 @ 19:37:38 Eastern

The whole Sarkeesian episode has been interesting in a couple ways.  Much like the Zimmerman case large bodies of opinion built up on either side of a quickly dualistic divide which had little relationship to reality.  It then turns out the real situation is both much simpler and more complicated than previously expected, and almost everyone was wrong.

On that note, I offer the following video essay by Jordan Owen:

Anita Sarkeesian: the Early Years

Unless Owen's claims are flatly refuted by contradictory evidence I rest on his claims and other available information to the following conclusions:
-The harassment campaign was the real prize, not the money
-Sarkeesian's work has never held up to serious analysis, but was never meant to
-The multiple forms of plagiarism in the videos now makes perfect sense: when the videos had yet to come out (and were nearly a year behind schedule) the claims of fraud started to swell.  When the pacing between the release took (and is still taking) ages to get out the claims of fraud start to again swell - each release was meant to push that tide back but since the releases themselves are coming under fire...
-Cameron Rodgers was wrong.  Sarkeesian won't land next to Moviebob and Extra Creditz in the 'pretentious idiot' shelf and she won't be swept under the rug by anyone.
-Sarkeesian isn't just another loudmouth with an opinion and a megaphone; she's a hustler pretending to be one.

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
Shadowrun Returns Review
Posted on Saturday, August 10 2013 @ 17:37:18 Eastern

First, watch MrBTongue's Cyberpunk is Back

With that amount of well-considered optimism in view we must ask - was the wait worth it?  Did the game deliver?  For those out only for a purchase/don't purchase guide and nothing more - Yes.  If you like cyberpunk and/or turn based western RPGs with sufficient tactical depth to require good decision making to succeed then this is a game you want.


The out-of-combat systems utilize a standard recursive conversation model seen in such games as Fallout, Dragon Age, Baldur's Gate, The Elder Scrolls series, and Planescape: Torment (it should be noted that, sadly, Torment's crown is still firmly in place - this is not the game to dethrone it from its ever loftier perch) with hard skill and stat based lockouts to create avenues of strategic decision making for character development and point-and-click 2D isometric controls for exploration.  In combat movement across the various locations becomes a resource paid for in action points along with attacking, reloading, going into overwatch and using items.  While not the deepest system ever seen, it works well and there are no obvious dead zones or game breakers.


Shadowrun Returns is built in the Unity Engine, for the good and ill that it bodes.  On the one hand it's obvious how the engine's straightforward implementation and off-the-shelf elements enabled Harebrained Schemes to go from concept to finished product on a short development cycle with limited resources.  Good art direction and clever use of assets ensures that each location feels unique and yet believable - by Shadowrun standards.  On the other there are some limits imposed by the nature of the project and the tools used.  It would be unfair to impose the standards of AAA development on a small scale indie project but one can wish and dream of a time when a more cerebral sort of game can reach a mass market.  Another mixed bag is sound.  The soundtrack is pitch perfect and tonally dead-on at all times.  On the other hand, the playthrough completed for this review was rife with sound glitches which got worse as the playthrough continued.


Given its setting, source material and inspiration, it was inevitable that the story would be a pot-boiler with a dead person needing avenging and a lonely, down-on-their-luck Runner out to do the job out of either loyalty to their departed friend, mercenary desire for cash, the thrill of the job or even an idealistic commitment to giving the dead their due and ensuring justice done.  The player is free to interpolate these motives into the character and express it through speech.  This is a central element of the game.  It is even possible to play Proteus and obfuscate one's motivations - betraying a deep-seated distrust towards others and a severe reservation about disclosing one's interior monologue.  None of the characters given dimension are overtly simple, complex problems beginning early in life spiralling outward into adult affairs have repercussions carrying on years afterward.  One is often chasing ghosts of a past that would be better if it could just stay there and not linger.  What visuals cannot do fun, engaging writing more than makes up for in several areas.  The Troll bouncer at a brothel turns out to be one of the most relatable, complex characters in the story and not for lack of competition.  Flavor text fleshes out bits of the world and develops character in interesting ways possible only to that approach.  It's not perfect, however.  The villain is an obvious giveaway the instant the player meets them.  It adheres to genre conventions for Noir, RPGs, Cyberpunk and detective stories.  It does not take time out to subvert them.  As writing is relatively cheap to do well, this is one area where the game could have truly shined and transcended its other limitations.


Short and simple reaction loops provide a sense of secondary reality and it often works flawlessly but glitches give away the technical language of it to such an extent that it shatters the whole enterprise.  It's more or less a question of luck whether a player will run into them.  The biggest mechanical weakness in the game, to the extent that it is actually a weakness and not simply a glaring reminder of the extent to which games have become oversimplified and refuse to punish bad decision making is the importance of having a Decker.  There are several missions which are outright impossible without one.  They are always among the most useful characters in the game.  Lastly, though this is more than a bit of a whine, why the Hell couldn't Armitage stick around longer?  Dude's seriously cool.


Score - 4.0 out of 5
+It's Shadowrun!
+What more do you want, for crying out loud?
+Good Turn-Based RPG systems
-With some balance issues
+Lovely art design
+Seattle campaign is fun, interesting
-But very short
+Toolset provided means it won't be the only one
+Jake Armitage makes a cameo
-But only a cameo
-Sound problems downright irritating
-Some bugs may create accidental plot holes
+/-Unity limitations not overtly problematic, but noticeable
+/-It's possible to play oneself into a corner, forcing a restart
+/-Deckers are essential, but it's a Goddamned Cyberpunk setting so that should be obvious
+/-Vote Dunkelzahn!

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
Spec Ops: The Line Review
Posted on Friday, August 2 2013 @ 16:13:45 Eastern

Worth its Weight in Leaden Pretension

This review is not late to the party.  It's a sifting of the ruins of the house after the party ended.  A real bender.  Everyone got drunk.  With the distance of time and a healthy appraisal of the shallowness of the effusive praise piled upon it the ultimate diagnosis is - depressing, with a chance of dyspepsia.  Just about the most shameful thing that could be said of the whole sordid affair was how the game's objective weaknesses were cited as strengths.  The usual art envy crowd were out in force defending barely interactive cutscenes as the height of the medium.

The Game - What of it There Is to Call a Game

"There is a simple test that can be used to identify bad videogames – simply load up a walkthrough of the videogame on YouTube and watch it.

Do you:

A – find yourself engaged in the videogame. Do you find differences in how you could’ve approached each situation? Are you curious to play it yourself and test the outcomes of your choices?


B – passively watch the player go through the motions, knowing that your playing experience will almost exactly correlate with what you’re seeing." --The Shillin' Field "Spec Ops: The Line is a Bad Videogame1

Spec Ops: The Line belongs to that species of game first inaugurated by Ninja Gaiden all the way back in 1988.  There's a straight-forward carrot and stick approach to storytelling.  Survive the thrashing of the carrot - beat a bit of linear game - and you can eat some stick - watch a badly shot cutscene - in a repeat fashion.  Ninja Gaiden has always been simple enough that the player could ignore the cut scenes entirely and stay on the game.  Intermediately Ninja Gaiden differs from Spec Ops: The Line by virtue of superior mechanics, level design, and genuinely engaging play that is some of the most fondly remembered and which still holds up all the positive aspects of its reputation even today.  Spec Ops: The Line is ultimately no different.  Nothing in the story segments is actually needed to proceed through the game segments.  Despite the attempt to deepen the connection between the two systems they remain fundamentally divided and the gulf is unbridged.  

Mechanically the game clearly apes Gears of War to the point that if it used a more blatantly science fictional setting and abused Specular Highlight more it could be confused for a knock-off.  That is to say, its pretentions to satire and commentary are all that set it apart.  Some minor change-ups to the expected formula are on display.  The ability to flip emplaced turrets2 if one can get close to them, an emphasis on environment-based warfare (use of conveniently placed explosive barrels and explosive barrels disguised as piles of sand) in the contexts where doled out and general behavior from the two AI squadmates in accord with their touted intelligence (they seem to love running headlong into automatic rifle fire all the same, however) all give the experience some measure of tactility and engagement.  However, much of the functionality is completely arbitrary.  At times the player will be starving for ammunition and at others be given infinite ammo.  Some times the player will only be able to shoot their way through and to provide a break in the monotony the player will be forced to commit a war crime and then be told off for it.  The controls are frustrating and badly implemented due to lazy key map setup3, sloppy movement controls and occasionally bad camera.  In contrast with Deus Ex: Human Revolution, which made radical player choice a core feature of its design, also featured much better cover controls and a much higher sense of optionality overall.

The Story

"Let's get this out of the way first: the entire premise is ludicrous." --Delta V, "Maginot"

Three men enter Dubai4 and comprise a Delta Force fire team5 sent to investigate the mysterious fate of the lost city, its thousands of remaining inhabitants, the 33rd Infantry Battalion and their commander Colonel John Konrad after their failed attempt6 to rescue the remaining civilians of Dubai from an oncoming wave of sandstorms7.  The story quickly takes a series of diversionary turns as Walker chases one increasingly desperate half-baked lead after another.  Clutching at vanishing straws and finally losing his mind he hallucinates John Konrad tormenting him and his men.  What follows is an increasingly surrealistic (and mindlessly brutal) rampage through the ruins of Dubai.  By the end of the game almost everyone is dead and all that is left is for Walker to chase phantoms.  The moment the psychotic break starts the story falls entirely apart.  The game treats mental illness as not even a plot device, which would be lazy and offensive enough, but as a plot-squashing device.  It allows them to plug the innumerable leaks in the plot by saying the reality of the situation is never clear8 after a certain point in the story.


One theory stipulates any game with good art direction and high production values is bound to get high scores such that poor controls, dull gameplay, simplistic mechanics, harebrained writing and downright bad design will be overlooked.  This certainly helps to account for Spec Ops: The Line's critical success.  The game makes good use of Unreal 3.  It is a feast of high resolution visuals and very subtle attention to detail shines throughout.  The voice acting, which changes with the characters, is occasionally on tone but there are often slips.  One moment Walker sounds just like he looks - like a deranged madman who just survived a helicopter crash screaming in frustration and rage at getting shot in the middle of one more leg of a long psychotic killing spree, and the next he sounds like Nathan Drake.  The sudden switch isn't accounted for in any way and it helps to shatter the illusion that Yager's writers wanted to craft.  Further, it is one of the few Unreal 3 games where all the characters don't look like greasy plastic dolls.  This is apparently due to the poor application of ambient occlusion effects by developers but Yager's technical team managed to keep it under control.  The opulent ruins of Dubai are beautifully captured.  It's a shame, really, that such a fine art team was put to work on such a lousy game.


"I like the game though.  I like that it exists.  Shooters are at a standstill right now.  They're ****.  They're **** thematically, they're **** mechanically.  They're **** in just about every way you could think of." --Michael Tsarouhas, Spec Ops Criticism: An Emotional Cheap Shot

Spec Ops: The Line is a predatory and manipulative trap designed to snare ignorant minds into believing they understand something.  Only the truly ignorant could fall for it.  It works on no level whatsoever.  As a deconstruction of the Modern Warfare-like shooters to which it is a reaction it fails by being mechanically weaker than them and not embracing enough of their assumptions to essay responses to them.  As a deconstruction of escapism it fails by robbing the player of agency.  As a general attack on shooters it fails because a series of trends which came and went entirely on the PC escape its evaluation and reaction.  As an attack on video game violence and what it is presumed to say about players of such games it fails by vice of an immature understanding of why people play shooters at all.  As a criticism of aggressive foreign policy or military adventurism it fails by virtue of its unrealistic assumptions about the nature of warfare, soldiering, human psychology, combat, meteorology, history, strategic theory and political philosophy.  As an intertextual retelling of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness it fails so completely a smart and unambitious student could write a decent thesis paper on it.  The amount of research the game needed to get right, but clearly didn't even bother, to have even a serious chance of boating across its main points without falling apart at the seams is astounding.


There is no price low enough to justify the purchase.  At any price the game is an even more pretentious insult to the player's intelligence than Mass Effect 3 and Bioshock Infinite.  The game is endlessly, insufferably, insultingly pretentious.  This culminates in a vain attempt to frame everything that the player has done as primarily the player's responsibility rather than the developer's.  As the author of the game's universe the developers and writers at Yager have taken on the metaphysical role of God.  All that is possible is so by their dispensation.  All that is not, all choices which cannot be undertaken due to existential impossibility, are also that way because the developers will it.  Their inability to take responsibility for this in numerous press outings is fathomless in its irony.

1:Every linked article or video is a destructive criticism of the game.  For purposes of highlight I won't be linking to sources which heaped praise on it.  In addition to having no sympathy for them their positions are straightforward and (horrifyingly) monolithic to the extent that it is actually unecessary.
2:The lack of freedom to swivel the turrets is thus without justification; it is an independent iteration of the very sort of makeshift contrived design the game is apparently deconstructing.
3:it is impossible to divest the Sprint function from the slip out of cover function, it is also impossible to divest the contextual action key from them.  That's right.  Contextual action, sprint, and slip out of cover are all bound to the same key, no matter what, and short of scripts or macros there's no way to fix that.  This is definitely a console game - there is literally a different key ready to hand for each of those functions right next to the move keys and yet it is not possible to change the setup into something more keyboard friendly.
4: How, we cannot be sure.  There is no clear indication how Walker or his two subordinates got to Dubai.  We only ever see them walking through a sandstorm along a highway toward the city.
5: The fire team is nine men short.  They typically deploy in two groups of six.  Neither Walker nor his cohorts ever remark on this unusual deployment situation.  If the nine missing men were ever part of the team they are never mentioned.  It's just as likely that Yager's writers didn't bother to research how special forces groups deploy or didn't care about justifying the problem in view that the three man squad setup was mandated prior to the writing of the game's story.  It is not a plot hole. It is a research failure.  However, it is of such basic priority and of such overall significance that the numerous other problems in the game seem to reflect that cavalier attitude.
6: Nothing about the original rescue attempt makes any sense whatsoever.  There's no way Konrad could have even gotten his men, or himself, to Dubai from Afghanistan on his own authority.  Nor, by the same token, could his men have facilitated any kind of evacuation.  Further, the chosen method is itself nonsensical - they attempted to drive out by the highway though Dubai is a coastal city and naval evacuation would have been far more expedient.  Further, Walker's mission is nonsensical from the first.
7: There is no precedent for such a storm or system of storms.  Whether this is a reference to Tanis or just a completely incompetent setup is hard to say.
8: As Michael Tsarouhas asks in his review, 'if you're insane, how come you're so damn functional?'  Walker's madness is completely convenient.  It only shows up when the writers need it to and then it quickly vanishes.  There are no lingering mechanical consequences of Walker's increasingly deranged mental state.  Further, if one insists on asserting the reality of the nature of psychosis, it becomes clear that Walker must have been mentally ill long before going to Dubai, but that only raises more questions and tears more holes in the plot.

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
The Phil Fish Saga Part Tres, The Patheticking
Posted on Tuesday, July 30 2013 @ 13:06:13 Eastern

So, just when Phil Fish's particular brand of histrionic self-aggrandizing reached its supposed apex - him running off like a child who cannot take the heat when he lights himself on fire - he doubles down.

Trigger Warning: The fol...  

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
On the Question of Anita Sarkeesian's Integrity
Posted on Friday, July 19 2013 @ 21:13:23 Eastern

This post is not about the merits of Sarkeesian's thesis, her approach, analytical methods, ideology or content of her arguments.  This is purely a question of the ethical character of her work.  A considerable portion of her credibilit...   read more...

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
An Open Letter to Peter Moore
Posted on Wednesday, April 10 2013 @ 10:47:53 Eastern

Dear Peter Moore,

I understand your company was in the running to receive and then won the worst company in America award.  Let me start by saying I don't think you deserved it. There are worse offend...   read more...

[ 14 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]

Deus Ex: Invisible War Is a Deeply Flawed Game.
Posted on Wednesday, March 6 2013 @ 15:10:10 Eastern

Compared to its predecessor, Deus Ex, it is inferior in every way save one arguable exception, and that came at a terrible price.  The following is a disordered rambling attempt to show how and why broken down by particular subfield.

...  

[ 1 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
Randy Pitchford, Coney Fetcher
Posted on Sunday, March 3 2013 @ 15:11:30 Eastern

Randy Pitchford is a damned fool.  This is not news to anyone who has heard him make proclamations or try to defend his arguments or behavior.  This latest incident of 'Randy Pitchford made a fool of himself again' concerns an artic...   read more...

[ 1 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
A Copy of Sega Awakens' AP and RDR Post
Posted on Wednesday, February 27 2013 @ 12:13:09 Eastern

This is a repost of another writers' work.  I do not own it or have any special rights to it.

The Ugly Side of the Business.   First off, let me say that these incidents happen in any job environment.  Poor...   read more...

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
A Copy of Sega Awakens' A:CM Post
Posted on Wednesday, February 27 2013 @ 12:09:44 Eastern

This is a Repost.  I do not hold the rights to it at all.  It belongs to whoever wrote it.

That eventual Aliens: Colonial Marines post   Looks like I have to finally post this information.  Going through a...   read more...

[ 0 Comments ]        [ Post a Comment ]
prev |  1 |  2 |  3 |  4 |  next
More On GameRevolution