More Reviews
REVIEWS Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Rebor Review
Just a small update to the existing review for the PS4 version of the game. What are the benefits to upgrading? Check here to see. ~Ed. Nick Tan

Cut the Rope: Triple Treat Review
Cutting the ropes has never before made gravity so… pricey.
More Previews
PREVIEWS Sniper Elite 3 Preview
Sending bullets through the hate.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Trials Fusion
Release date: Out Now

The Amazing Spider-Man 2
Release date: 04/29/14

Bound by Flame
Release date: 05/09/14

Wolfenstein: The New Order
Release date: 05/20/14


LATEST FEATURES 4 PAX Indie Titles to Look Out For
We've given attention to all the higher profile games at PAX EAST, but now it's time for the indies.

Ouya's Best Games Coming to the Platform
The Kickstarter console is slowly establishing itself with a couple of creative gems on the way.
 
Coming Soon

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP shandog137
So much more than war...
By shandog137
Posted on 04/18/14
The recent blog, Peace in the Era of Call of Duty  really made me think about war games that dig deeper than simply a kill streak reward. The first game that came to mind was Spec-Ops: The Line and although I haven’t played it, I began to wonder if it did the war genre as...

DAILY MANIFESTO

A Psycho's Analysis

Posted on Monday, August 21 @ 19:05:54 Eastern by Joe_Dodson
Psychopaths, sociopaths, violent video gamers, lend me your severed ears.

A new study, published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, has found that a mere twenty minutes of video game violence is enough to desensitize you to carnage and trauma. I know what you're thinking, and you're right - that is barely enough time to beat a man to death with his own arm - but keep your human skin pants on. We may not be as crazy as psychologists would have us believe.

The study, carried out by Professor Nicholas Carnagey of Iowa State University and brought to our attention by Gamedaily, had one group of subjects play violent video games and another group play nonviolent video games, then exposed both to violent videos of "shootings, stabbings, prison fights, courtroom outbursts, and confrontations with police" while monitoring the subjects' heart rates and perspiration. According to the shrinks, "those who had engaged in violent games had "lowered physiological responses," apparently because they had been desensitized by the virtual violence, while those who played the "passive" games had increased heart rates and perspiration when they saw the video footage, implying that they were upset by it."

I'd like to point out that, while there is no proven link between video game violence and real violence, there is proof that psychological studies can make people do horrible things. Just ask Stanley Milgram. Also, the study assumes that increased heart rates and perspiration are signs of distress, but aren't they also common symptoms of arousal? The psychologists seem to take for granted that, in our natural state, we should be bothered by violence, without allowing that we might really be hot and bothered. After all, if we didn't have a hard-on for violence in the first place, why would we play violent games and watch violent movies?

Carnagie asserts that "Individuals who play violent video games get used to it. They eventually become physiologically numb to it," and I think he might be right. But before you name a dog after me and feed it to a wood chipper, read this Gamasutra article; it argues that the anesthetic nature of video games might actually be a good thing, helping us cope with the pain and trauma of our real lives. Instead of driving us to skin small animals and shoot up post offices, video games might actually make the world a safer, saner place. That'll be five hundred dollars.



comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution