More Reviews
REVIEWS The Incredible Adventures of Van Review
Van Helsing returns to Borgovia to slay monsters and take revenge. Is the final installment of this popular ARPG series considered a worthwhile conclusion?

Epanalepsis Review
Adventure…?
More Previews
PREVIEWS Trine 3: The Artifacts of Power Preview
The popular puzzle-platforming series moves from 2D to 3D, but will it be a flawless jump or a headlong dive into a bottomless crevasse?
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Class of Heroes 2G
Release date: 06/02/15

LEGO Jurassic World
Release date: 06/12/15

Deception IV: The Nightmare Princess
Release date: 06/14/15

RIDE
Release date: 06/23/15


LATEST FEATURES The Top 10 Beards in Gaming as Magnificent as Geralt's... Almost
From hipsters to burly men to RPG protagonists, beards are in. These ten characters make bushy look beautiful.

Diving Back In: A Rise Of The Tomb Raider Wish List
How this year's Tomb Raider can improve upon its predecessor.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oblivion437     In all the talk of graphical downgrades no one seems much preoccupied with 'why?'.  Why build something and then proceed to tear it down, piece by piece, in the hope that ever more diminished expectations about the final product won't be severe enough to...

DAILY MANIFESTO

Meta-Hypocrites

Posted on Thursday, November 16 @ 19:29:40 Eastern by Joe_Dodson
"If you criticize our site, we'll de-list you." At least, that's the message we got from Metacritic.com.

In late July, we ran a piece lampooning three meta review sites, Gamerankings, RottenTomatoes, and Metacritic. We mainly did this because they were turning our review grades into random numbers and assorted fruits, but also because we thought one or all of them might read our report and fix some of the problems we noticed. People pay good money for that kind of abuse, and ours was free!

Anyway, a couple weeks after we ran our piece, I went to Metacritic to see if they were still inflicting their underpants gnome math on our grades. Well, they stopped doing that. In fact, they stopped featuring our reviews entirely a couple days after we ran the piece. I emailed founder Marc Doyle, whom I initially interviewed for the article, asking why Metacritic no longer carries our reviews, but he never responded. However, I suspect the missing answer has to do with us calling their grade conversion scheme "Loco," and criticizing this quote of his:

We don’t think that a review from, say, Roger Ebert or Game Informer, for example, should be given the same weight as a review from a small regional newspaper or a brand new game critic.”

That's Marc explaining how Game Informer's and Roger Ebert's opinions are more right than those of lesser known critics, in spite of the fact that Roger Ebert believes games aren't art, and Game Informer is owned by the GameStop chain of stores. Given the value Marc and his site seem to place on smaller publications like ours, it didn't come as a big surprise when they dropped us for criticizing their practices.

That is, until we went to Metacritic's front page and saw their ironic trademarked motto: "We deal with criticism."

UPDATE - 11/20/07 As it turns out, Metacritic deals with criticism better than we thought. Today, Marc Doyle contacted Duke Ferris, and we think we've come to an understanding. Hopefully, you'll once again find Game Revolution lurking near the murky depths of Metacritic's charts, dragging their scores down into oblivion.



comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution