More Reviews
REVIEWS Devil's Third Review
Creator Tomonobu Itagaki said this game would be “revolutionary.” He was wrong.

Little Battlers eXperience Review
Tiny robots fighting for prizes is better than pocket monsters fighting, right? Right?
More Previews
PREVIEWS Supernova Preview
Primal Game Studios has tuned Supernova since last I saw it, with more commanders, special abilities, and a faster pace.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain
Release date: Out Now

Destiny: The Taken King
Release date: 09/15/15

Skylanders SuperChargers
Release date: 09/20/15

LEGO Dimensions
Release date: 09/27/15


LATEST FEATURES MGSV: The Phantom Pain De-Emphasizes Story and It Works
Actually playing Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain is the best part of the game, which may be a first for the series.

Kojima Responds To Konami By Placing More Than 60 Credit Screens In MGSV: The Phantom Pain
Made by Hideo Kojima. Written by Hideo Kojima. Produced by Hideo Kojima. Created by Hideo Kojima. Directed by Hideo Kojima...

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP Ivory_Soul
Windows 10 Review for Dummies
By Ivory_Soul
Posted on 08/11/15
After all these years, and growing up with Windows 3.1, I have seen an entire evolution of computers and software. Touch screens and large resolutions were a pipe dream just 15 years ago. Now it's the norm. Going from a Packard Bell (yes, before HP) that couldn't run 3D Ultra Mini...

DAILY MANIFESTO

The Exclusively Untrustworthy

Posted on Wednesday, December 3 @ 17:58:48 PST by Duke_Ferris
Review embargoes (ie. not publishing a review until a certain date) are quite common in both the game and movie biz. They have seldom been problematic, until now.

These are almost never contractually enforced, but they are socially enforced as we, on both sides of the gaming fence, are all professionals who have to work together. And I think it’s fair for gaming companies to want us to not trash-talk their products until they’re actually out. Think of it as a gentlemen’s agreement, and here at GR we always honor them.

However, recently I have noticed a disturbing new trend: The Exclusive Review.

This is where one publisher is given the blessing to publish their review before anyone else. Eidos has apparently gone so far (or at least their UK public relations firm has) as to try and make their embargo dates score-based, letting the good reviews publish before the bad ones.

So I talked to a must-remain-anonymous journalist and video game reviewer for a large media outlet. Let’s just say that it’s a large enough place that you can buy its stock on Wall Street. He said that not only was his publication doing this, they we’re doing it on their own. His bosses were pushing him for higher review scores, and changing around the publishing dates depending on those scores. The amazing part is that they are doing this without always being prompted by the game publishers - they’re actually frightened of them and the power of their ad dollars.

Now to be fair, Eidos here in the U.S. said nothing to GR about Tomb Raider: Underworld, but at least they were up-front in the UK about a bit of honest dishonesty, rather than the sneakier veiled threats and the subterfuge of the Exclusive Review.

Alert the lawyers, I’m about to get specific. You see, IGN had the Exclusive Review for Prince of Persia, and here’s all the ways that’s problematic.

1- Money. An exclusive review is always tied into an ad buy, and you may notice that IGN is covered in PoP ads.

2- Honesty. I polled several Product Managers for different games, and they all said they would never agree to an exclusive review unless they knew exactly what the score was going to be ahead of time (and it had better be high, damn high).

3- Fear. Especially after the firing of Jeff Gerstmann any reviewer is bound to be a bit nervous in this situation. At worst, their boss says, “We don't care about the game. Write a good review so we get this $100,000 ad buy, or else”. And at best they worry about that unspoken possibility.

4- Pressure. Having to stick your neck out there and criticize a title without any of your fellow critics around to provide distraction is hard. Especially since you've probably met a number of people who have worked hard on the title. “Look, I may have said the game sucked, but over at GR they said the game sucked balls.”

5- Sex. Ok, so sex really doesn’t play into this, but I felt it needed to be on the list.

How much collusion was there between Ubisoft and IGN? How direct was it? How much fear?

The sad (or happy) part of it is that I can’t prove anything because Prince of Persia is actually a pretty good game. I may not have praised it as much as IGN’s Hilary Goldstein, but her his comments are not out of line when compared to some other opinions out there. However, I guarantee that Eidos saw every word of that review before it was published.

And I’m not singling out Eidos, Ubisoft, or IGN here. I’m watching everyone closely and I urge you to do the same. If you ever see that Exclusive Review on GR, be suspicious.

 



comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution