More Reviews
REVIEWS The Incredible Adventures of Van Review
Van Helsing returns to Borgovia to slay monsters and take revenge. Is the final installment of this popular ARPG series considered a worthwhile conclusion?

Epanalepsis Review
Adventure…?
More Previews
PREVIEWS Trine 3: The Artifacts of Power Preview
The popular puzzle-platforming series moves from 2D to 3D, but will it be a flawless jump or a headlong dive into a bottomless crevasse?
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Class of Heroes 2G
Release date: 06/02/15

LEGO Jurassic World
Release date: 06/12/15

Deception IV: The Nightmare Princess
Release date: 06/14/15

RIDE
Release date: 06/23/15


LATEST FEATURES The Top 10 Beards in Gaming as Magnificent as Geralt's... Almost
From hipsters to burly men to RPG protagonists, beards are in. These ten characters make bushy look beautiful.

Diving Back In: A Rise Of The Tomb Raider Wish List
How this year's Tomb Raider can improve upon its predecessor.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oblivion437     In all the talk of graphical downgrades no one seems much preoccupied with 'why?'.  Why build something and then proceed to tear it down, piece by piece, in the hope that ever more diminished expectations about the final product won't be severe enough to...

DAILY MANIFESTO

What's Wrong with Metacritic?

Posted on Monday, October 11 @ 21:49:29 Eastern by
Aggregator sites are popular with both consumers and corporations. They aren't popular with this reviewer.

I'll admit, I lean on Metacritic and Game Rankings from time to time. First, I like to read reviews. I think they can contain a ton of interesting insight to games and how we play them. Also, I'm an English major so criticism is just plain fun to me. But ever since I started reviewing here, I've noticed some things that are completely wrong with review scores.



To be clear, we take reviews pretty seriously *smirk* here at Game Revolution, and I think letter grades are a great way to measure games in terms of scores. They're abstract enough to allow some wiggle room, they reflect the fact that everyone considers games under a 7 to be crap (through the use of "F"), and they can't be argued over as obviously as numerical scores.

This is why I hate it when Metacritic takes my C-grade of Castlevania: Harmony of Despair and calls it a 42. Or when I'm responsible for Backbreaker's lowest score, 33, despite having given the game a D+. Those numerical scores just aren't right. Do the reviews feel like that number? Do the reviews back up that number? No. They back up my letter grade, and only that letter grade.

I also don't like my review scores being used to determine the financial well-being of game developers. But that's a completely different story.

The bottom line is: Read the fucking article everybody.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.


comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution