|
|
| Posted: Sep 1st, 2006 at 2:48 am |
 |
|
| i agree with some of what you saying they should up the graphics buut i thought it was fine there should have been new spells,but the story line was ok the way it was and there were different worlds and the organization was longer then 5 seconds it was most the story line. |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Jan 3rd, 2007 at 5:53 pm |
|
|
| It could use more/better worlds but an "F" is way off, arials world sucked ass I hated it, but Sora kicks so much ass when he's maxed out , just the fact that you get to fight Sephoroth the game gets a "C+" your crazy |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Mar 7th, 2007 at 7:56 pm |
|
|
| i agree with you in some points
but still i think the game is good and deserves an A
becouse you are rating this game
not comparing it with the 1st part of it
and i guess the game is fine after all
|
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Jun 13th, 2007 at 4:01 am |
|
|
| did you even actually play Kingdom Hearts II? If you had, you would have known to give it a good rating. |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Jun 15th, 2007 at 10:06 pm |
|
|
| ok first this game is freankin awsome , ok i agree that arials world sucks but hey no one is perfect . |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Jun 16th, 2007 at 7:32 pm |
|
|
| if you played chain of memories then you'd know the backstory of the organization is a lot longer then 5 seconds foo' |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted: Sep 24th, 2007 at 4:10 pm |
 |
|
| They need to lose "100 Acre woods" and Little Mermaid, but an F is harsh. I also agree that it should fill you in on the whole backstory itself; you shouldnt have to have played the other two games to be able to follow everything. However, I think you have ADD and didnt finish the game or look at any of the cutscenes. I mean, your review didnt even have patience for puntuation. |
|
| |
|
Login to post a comment or rate this review.
|
RSS FEEDS
