Join Help
 Forgot Password
GameRevolution
PlayStation 3/PS3 Member Reviews
RSS News Feed

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - PS3

By:
jeff_himself
10/20/09
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION
EMAIL TO A FRIEND
GENRE Action 
PLAYERS
PUBLISHER Sony 
DEVELOPER Naughty Dog 
ESRB
BUY FROM VIDEO GAME CENTRAL
RENT FROM GAMEFLY
SWAP AT SAY SWAP
COMPARE AT PRICEGRABBER



Who all see an overrated game, say "YEAH!"

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is essentially a reworking of the Uncharted: Drake's Fortune with a different setting and characters. Many flaws of the original game are still present in the sequel: the game is still repetitive; it is still too easy; the story is still garbage that relies on supernatural monsters provide an additional "challenge" during the later stages of the game. The plot of Uncharted 2: Among Thieves borrows heavily from the first game and Indiana Jones and the Temple of the Crystal Skull--the final scene takes place in a very large and seemingly very observable "hidden" city guarded by arrow firing natives. In this game Drake seeks to find a mythical stone with magical powers before an adversary with a large army find it for himself. The journey takes Drake from city streets to mountain villages and ancient temples. There is plenty of climbing and jumping, but not much in the way of puzzles. The ancient people built the temples full of Rube Goldberg machines must not have been the puzzle-type. Drake encounters several temples full of ledges and platforms to jump on, but only two puzzles during the game--the game nicely puts a graphic on screen to indicate that it is puzzle time so even the stupidest player will know that he needs to accomplish some small task if he wants to move on to the next room. The plot is being marketed as being loaded with action and deception. Action--if by "action" one means shooing thousands of rounds--the game has. Deception not so much. As Drake searches for the lost stone he learns that his companion Chloe may or may not be helping his adversary. But it is clear from the beginning the Chloe is loyal to Drake even while working with the enemy. The storywriters do aim high, but come up short. It is fun to see almost every action movie cliche thrown into a video game though: Drake jumps from train car to train car while avoiding low hanging signals and a helicopter gunship; Drake runs from a large vehicle; Drake runs from a tank; a train car hangs precariously over the edge of a cliff; and so on. There are plenty of explosions to placate those--likely under the age of 13--who consider shit blowing up to be "drama." Much of the dialogue is macho adventure talk about the hero saving the day. The game's story will most impress the teenage set. Aside from being offensive from a writing perspective the plot comes off as being completely sexist--female characters are either in need of saving due to their inept and naive ways or manipulative and traitorous. The player gets to live out every macho fantasy of saving the damsel in distress while blowing shit up. Strangely there are also no female enemy characters as soldiers or native villagers during the climax implying a strong tendency towards strong male companionship. I must give Naughty Dog some respect here for loading the game with enough misogyny and homoeroticism to keep even the manliest of men happy.

The game is visually proficient. The settings, characters, and cinematics are very easy on the eyes. There are rare occasions when objects and textures look very poor and there seems to be a limited number of enemy death animations--most noticeable on the "skull" enemies who go down the same way every time you kill them--and character movement through water producing poor looking splashes and a minimal ripple effect (note: previously reported no ripple effect, but there is actually a subtle rippling; it is less than what would be expected however and does detract from the overall visual appeal). These shortcoming do tend to take away from the game's visual appeal, but they only amount to minor annoyances that can be easily overlooked as they do not hinder the gameplay.

But the actual gameplay does hinder gameplay. The game incorporates hand to hand combat, stealth, and action sequences, but never together. It is not possible to focus on being stealthy or avoiding confrontation except in the areas of the game designated for this type of play--few segments allow for any type of stealthy play. Drake cannot enter an area taking cover to avoid being noticed if the segment is intended to be about "action." Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is all about shooting bad guys that come out of nowhere before they kill Drake and force him to restart at the latest checkpoint--every room is a checkpoint so a player never has to replay any of the game previously completed. Much of the game centers around Drake jumping from platform to platform to ledge to platform or climbing around a locked door--there are several sequences in which Drake needs to go around locked doors and all require a bit of climbing. Climbing becomes a tedious chore made worse by level design where there is only one correct path so a player cannot explore to find the way to gain the most advantage while moving. Each new area has only one entrance and one exit so areas with enemy presence cannot be avoided through clever climbing--one wonders why Drake would drop into an area full of enemy soldiers instead of continuing past them. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is a very linear affair and the least adventuresome "action-adventure" game in recent memory. Everything needed to complete a room is always available so Drake is never forced to backtrack or even revisit scenes previously encountered. The game plays like "Smash TV" if "Smash TV" did not allow the player to choose which path to take through the game world. Difficulty is ratcheted down even on hardest levels due to an almost infinite amount of ammunition in most areas and an infinite ammunition cache during key battle sequences--Drake's side arm will magically replenish it's magazine while fighting monsters and while hanging on a sign while being attacked during another sequence for example. During several battle sequences Drake's gun will reload when out of ammunition to keep the fight going or ammunition will regenerate to allow Drake to keep shooting. This bottomless supply of ammo is necessary as certain enemies take lots and lots of fire before going down. And there are lots of enemies to kill.

One run through the game will take care of most of the achievements for kills using a specific weapon as there are is an everlasting supply of goons to dispatch. The game offers hints if a player is in an area too long without completing the "challenge" of that area on all difficulty settings. The game never forces the player to continue, but it strongly suggests it and shows the player what to do if they are ever confused, which is not very likely as the game is completely straightforward. AI is rather stupid for the most part taking cover during gunfights, but not always actually being under cover. Many enemy fighters will just walk towards Drake as he returns fire until dispatched. Friendly AI is equally as inept: those with Drake will completely ignore him as they move the extent that they force him off ladders and ropes to his death. There are other oddities that one will encounter through playing, such as moments in which dying will force the player forward and Drake auto-shooting propane tanks with no direct line of fire, which take the player out of the game and lessen the experience. Grenades are more deadly to enemy fighters as a grenade a few feet away from Drake will have no effect on him, but can take out multiple enemies at greater distances. Controls are functional with only minor issues. The cover system can often result in deaths as the player is locked to the wrong face of object and exposed to fire. While under cover any action besides firing results in Drake standing up in fire--picking up a grenade or weapon pulls Drake out of cover. Cover is controlled by the "roll" button so expect to lock to objects when trying to roll resulting in many deaths--especially on multiplayer.

Beating the game on "hard" opens up a "crushing" difficultly level that plays exactly like hard yet is supposedly more difficult. The game still provides all the hints, ammunition, and redos as the easier levels and nothing is changed story-wise leaving little reason to replay the game unless one values his existence by the number of PSN trophies he has collected. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves incorporates a multiplayer component where up to ten people can play team versions of death match and capture the flag/zones. A co-op mode is also supported with up to three players online. Multiplayer pairing is not particularly good as the system only allows the player to pick game type and wait for auto-matching to set up a game. This becomes a problem as the specific round rules are not picked until after the players have been paired. A simple vote system picks between two options. If an unpopular option is selected the team that does poorly initially usually empties creating lopsided matches. There is no ability to team change and no system to balance teams nor any late joining causing some matches to go on much longer than they should. There are no multiplayer options for matches so each match is the same layout all the time. Occasionally matches will have specific weapons, but in most cases the matches will start with players going for grenade or rocket launchers. There is no ability to turn off "perks" or force standard skins, which results in player who have completed the campaign mode or played more multiplayer to have an instant advantage. Negative perks are available for higher level players, but their use is not wide spread. As in the single player campaign there is a complete lack of control for the player. The game makes all the choices while allowing the player to think that he or she is actually doing something through the simple voting mechanic.

The addition of a multiplayer mode is the only reason to consider purchasing the game. Those not interested in running around as Drake shooting other Drakes while trying to capture treasure or zones would be advised to replay the original and imagine the setting as being Nepal instead of some South American forest. It would be a pretty good equivalent of Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, which is in no way a bad game. It is just not a very good game. It is almost too much like its predecessor to even be considered it own game,. The major differences between the games are the lack of traps and the inclusion of an actual boss battle instead of a pressing buttons as they appear on the screen--though melee battles still are based on pressing the button at the bottom left of the screen when the game indicates it.

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an average title worth renting before making any purchase decisions. The main campaign can be completed in under ten hours and subsequent replays--even with more difficult settings--will take much less time and be much less enjoyable. Multiplayer can be a nice time waster as long as the community remains strong. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is a game with loads of potential, but it is all wasted as it is content with being a shooting game in exotic locations. Uncharted is one more game that chose style over substance and ends up being all the worse because of it.

 
C
This review rating: Average Rating Views: 1209
Reviews by other members:
jeff_himself C
maca2kx A
BigTruckSeries A
Master_Craig A
Average Rating B+
 
Write a Review
 
COMMENTS

Prescott
Joined: Oct 22, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 8:24 am Rating
Who all see an over-exaggerated, absurd review say: ''YEAH!''

Prescott
Joined: Oct 22, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 8:25 am Rating
Who all see an over-exaggerated, absurd review say: ''YEAH!''

Prescott
Joined: Oct 22, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 8:25 am Rating
Who all see an over-exaggerated, absurd review say: ''YEAH!''

jeff_himself
Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 10:33 am
Describing a game is "overexaggating"? is that right?

Would claiming that game is the best ever and that there are no problems with it be "overexaggerating" too? Or would that be all right because it is praising what is ultimately ****--and three year old **** at that--wrapped in a pretty package?

alexstamat
Joined: May 7, 2006
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 1:17 pm
This revews smell a X-box fan boy ripping on a great game do you have anything better to do?

alexstamat
Joined: May 7, 2006
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 1:18 pm
This revews smell a X-box fan boy ripping on a great game do you have anything better to do?

Prescott
Joined: Oct 22, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm Rating
I'm sorry, but this review has no value of whatsoever... saying that the story sucks, the dialogue sucks, while this game is praised by Top-critics all over the world, who actually KNOW what they're talking about, then you're not being reasonable. You seem to take every MINOR issue of the game, and making it as big as it gets.

Bashing a critically acclaimed game, is just a desperate fanboy attempt. So in this case, I agree with alexstamat.

I mean geez, you could've just said: ''no, this game is not for me, to be honest.''

Prescott
Joined: Oct 22, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 2:01 pm Rating
I'm sorry, but this review has no value of whatsoever... saying that the story sucks, the dialogue sucks, while this game is praised by Top-critics all over the world, who actually KNOW what they're talking about, then you're not being reasonable. You seem to take every MINOR issue of the game, and making it as big as it gets.

Bashing a critically acclaimed game, is just a desperate fanboy attempt. So in this case, I agree with alexstamat.

I mean geez, you could've just said: ''no, this game is not for me, to be honest.''

jeff_himself
Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Posted: Oct 22nd, 2009 at 3:19 pm
It is not a horrible game. But it is highly overrated. I suggest that you play if before making any determination of the game as a whole. I have completed "hard" and "crushing" (which is more "frustrating" at certain sequences than anything else). I at least point out all of the problems in the game. There is no adventure besides what is conveyed via cutscenes. The gameplay is as linear as Pokemon Snap. It is repetitive as hell--if I could stand another run through the game I would love to time how much of the game is spent climbing. The plot mirrors the original with only a change in setting.

Trust me on this one. I may not be getting paid enough to "know what [I am] talking about", but this game is not as great as the early review indicate.
letusprey
letusprey
Joined: Jan 4, 2009
Posted: Oct 24th, 2009 at 8:34 pm Rating
Wow...what a **** review.
letusprey
letusprey
Joined: Jan 4, 2009
Posted: Oct 24th, 2009 at 8:34 pm Rating
Wow...what a **** review.
letusprey
letusprey
Joined: Jan 4, 2009
Posted: Oct 24th, 2009 at 8:34 pm Rating
wow...what a **** review

Driscoll74
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Posted: Oct 26th, 2009 at 7:45 am
jeff, you are a courageous man.

There's nothing I appreciate more than ripping down a horribly overrated game.

Oh wait, I'm sorry. It couldn't possibly be overrated. After all "this game is praised by Top-critics all over the world". So it has to be good. Critics have never hyped a bad game ever.

Driscoll74
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Posted: Oct 26th, 2009 at 7:45 am
jeff, you are a courageous man.

There's nothing I appreciate more than ripping down a horribly overrated game.

Oh wait, I'm sorry. It couldn't possibly be overrated. After all "this game is praised by Top-critics all over the world". So it has to be good. Critics have never hyped a bad game ever.
madster111
madster111
Joined: Jun 4, 2006
Posted: Oct 26th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Everyone rating this review bad is a complete moronic ****.

Did you actually read it? It was a great review. You don't mark reviews bad for their opinions, morons.
LinksOcarina
LinksOcarina
Joined: Nov 9, 2005
Posted: Oct 28th, 2009 at 2:17 pm Rating
I have read it. It's a decent review, except there is a lot of weird little things that annoyed me, gramattically at least. Still, not too bad.
damo_rox619
damo_rox619
Joined: Jan 23, 2007
Posted: Oct 29th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
i'm sorry but i just cant respect anything you've mentioned. bad story? bad dialogue? and too easy like the first one? come on, the story is awesome, there are basically no games with better dialogue out there and the game is by no means too easy. and the first game is especially challenging. im guessing that you really are a 360 fan-boy putting down a near perfect game (in my opinion) just because its on the ps3.

but even if thats not true, put it this way. comparing this game to halo 3 and gears of war 2: uncharted 2's graphics **** ALL OVER anything on the 360. the dialogue in all of gears of war and most of halo is very cheesy, and uncharted is not repetitive, it has a lot of variety for such a simple game, and how can you not think this games fun factor is enough to give it at least an A-? this is the most fun game i've ever played. seriously. im only not giving you're review a bad rating because the review itself isnt bad, i just dont like your opinion :)

jeff_himself
Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Posted: Nov 1st, 2009 at 4:03 pm
The story is garbage. The "hero" seeks out something and along the way everything goes all to ****. Anything he jumps on breaks sending him back. Someone is about to fall off of a ledge/cliff and is luckily saved at the last moment. Cliches are used again and again and again. Did the *******s at Naughty Dog really have to shoehorn every bad action film cliche possible into the game? Did they have to use each awful cliche five times? Did they need to use the exact plot-line from the original? I can imagine the next one already: Drake searches for an ancient object, but is distracted because he needs to save the girl while saving the world. Oh, and at somepoint during the final third of his journey he will be confronted by super-powered mutant creatures due to a magic gas (or maybe even a magic Bose–Einstein condensate to get every magic mutant cause phase of matter.)
UghRochester
UghRochester
Joined: Jun 5, 2006
Posted: Nov 9th, 2009 at 11:19 am
I love me

POST A COMMENT
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this review.
Username:
Password:
Remember me next time?