More Reviews
REVIEWS Screencheat Review
The first FPS in history where looking at your friends’ screens isn’t cheating; it’s a requirement.

Natural Doctrine Review
This actually might be "your dad's" Japanese TRPG, and for those with a hankering for it, that can be a very good thing.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Disney Fantasia: Music Evolved
Release date: Out Now

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Release date: 11/04/14

Far Cry 4
Release date: 11/18/14

Dragon Age: Inquisition
Release date: 11/18/14


LATEST FEATURES 7 Problems With Kingdom Hearts HD 2.5 ReMIX [Hands-on Preview]
For the last time, Aqua, NO I will not go out with you! (Yes, yes I will, actually.)

Xbox Downloads October 2014 - Updating Each Week
Microsoft's Xbox One console continues an Xbox Live revolution started over a decade ago. Here's hoping Summer of Arcade makes it to the platform next year.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oblivion437
I Don't Want to, but I Have To...
By oblivion437
Posted on 10/20/14
Well, Gamergate has spilled over into the mainstream media and the coverage appears to be nearly uniformly dreadful. Take " What is Gamergate, and What Does It Say About Gender In Video Games? " by David Konnow as an example.  It appears that the writer has done little to no...

GAMING NEWS

Pachter Says Activision Should Charge Subscription Fees For CoD Multiplayer

Posted on Friday, December 7 @ 09:16:01 Eastern by Keri_Honea


Michael Pachter, research analyst at Wedbush Securities, provided the opening speech at the Digital Game Monetization Summit yesterday. In his speech, he made several bold claims as Mr. Pachter is wont to do, one being that he believes Call of Duty is failure due to the fact that Activision doesn't charge fees for the multiplayer.

"Call of Duty, I'm calling it a failure," Pachter said. "I know the game sells billions of dollars. Activision did a bad thing with Call of Duty from a profit perspective. They trained gamers that you can buy a game and play it all year, ten hours a week, forever, and you never have to pay again. You just wait for the next Call of Duty. I promise you there are plenty of people, numbering in the millions, who play one game, which is Call of Duty, and they never stop. That's just like the people who play World of Warcraft and never stop, yet the World of Warcraft guys are paying $180 a year, and the Call of Duty guys are paying $60. So who's got a better model? This multiplayer thing being free was a mistake. I don't think anybody ever envisioned it would be this big. It's a mistake because it keeps those people from buying and playing other games.”

One could argue that Activision has attempted this model before with the Call of Duty Elite program, not to mention all of the DLC packs they sell for $15 a pop (and sell 2-4 million of just map packs, by the way).

The funniest part of this whole tirade was that at the end, after he basically scolded Activision for not charging for multiplayer, he said the following:

"Prediction: The next Bungie game will be single-player only; the multiplayer aspect of that game will be subscription only. Activision's going to try it, because they're greedy pigs, and they're bold.”

First they're failures for not charging a subscription for CoD multiplayer, and then they'll be greedy pigs if they do? Sounds to me like Activision is damned if they do, damned if they don't in Pachter's eyes. In the gamers eyes, I bet they'll be damned if they do, but plenty of people will cough up such a subscription, at least for a few months.

[Source]
 

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.


More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution