GAMING NEWSPublishers Use US Tax Code to the Tune of BillionsPosted on Monday, September 12 @ 10:00:00 Eastern by Daniel Bischoff
And remember, business is all about money, so it's no surprise that publishers do what it takes to hold on to that revenue, especially when Uncle Sam comes once a year to collect taxes on those billions. An article in The New York Times has shined a spotlight on Electronic Arts's methods around the IRS. At 35%, taxes on corporations can take quite a bit of wind out of company sales, so in 2004, EA hired Glen Kohl, former employee of the Treasury Department, who now lobbies for federal tax breaks for companies with established offshore subsidiaries in low-tax countries. EA now holds 50 such subsidiaries in countries like Mauritius. I don't even know where that is. EA also keeps $1.3 billion offshore so that it's not taxed in the United States. It's also well-known that Canada has gone out of its way to attract video game development studios to some of its fine cities. Montreal in particular netted Ubisoft $321,000 for every job it relocated to it from the United States. Canada also offers a tax credit equal to 37.5% of a developer's payrolls. I'll spare you the snarky comments and political opinions I have swimming around in my head right now. [Source] More from the Game Revolution Network Comments
Post a Comment
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this article.
|
|
| More On GameRevolution | |
tinymhg
Joined: Jun 2011
OdiousLupous
Joined: Jul 2011
Klandathu
Joined: Apr 2008
shandog137
Joined: Mar 2007
You know you want to, so go for it. But to be honest corporations have been doing this for decades. If you are feeling over zealous get audited financial statements for Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo and please review the notes to the financials. Video "games"... hard to equate the word game to multi billion dollar business transactions but we love em, we pay for em, and we are in capitalistic market so someone is bound to make a profit...just not always the right people.
sliverstorm
Joined: Jun 2007
Agree with this. It's basically a duty to shareholders to try and protect as much revenue from taxation as possible--you'd expect it from any company. Larger companies just have more options as to how because their higher earnings make obscure tactics more valuable.
mrallamericanboy
Joined: Jun 2006