More Reviews
REVIEWS Nitroplus Blasterz: Heroine Infi Review
The Super Smash Bros. of Japanese visual novels you’ve never heard of.

NARUTO SHIPPUDEN: Ultimate Ninja Review
Those familiar with the Naruto series should be pleased to know this finale gives everything there is to want in an ending episode.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Arslan: The Warriors of Legend
Release date: 02/09/16

Mighty No. 9
Release date: 02/09/16

Factotum 90
Release date: 02/10/16

Aegis of Earth: Protonovus Assault
Release date: 03/01/16


LATEST FEATURES A Tips Guide For Surviving XCOM 2's Difficult Campaign
Get a leg up on the alien opposition.

Guys, We've Reached... Peak Earthbound
We talk Earthbound -- the original postmodern RPG -- and then discuss YIIK: A Postmodern RPG with one of its creators.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP Ivory_Soul
Windows 10 Review for Dummies
By Ivory_Soul
Posted on 08/11/15
After all these years, and growing up with Windows 3.1, I have seen an entire evolution of computers and software. Touch screens and large resolutions were a pipe dream just 15 years ago. Now it's the norm. Going from a Packard Bell (yes, before HP) that couldn't run 3D Ultra Mini...

GAMING NEWS

Really, MEOW? Keyboard Cat and Nyan Cat Suing Warner Bros.

Posted on Thursday, May 2 @ 14:59:26 PST by


Does that mean I can't make a game about the Keyboard Nyan Fusion Cat now?

Keyboard Cat creator Charles Schmidt and Nyan Cat creator Christopher Orlando Torres are suing (yes, this is a thing now) Warner Bros. and 5th Cell for their use of both cats in the Scribblenauts franchise. This includes the original Scribblenauts in 2009, Super Scribblenauts in 2010, Scribblenauts Remix in 2011, and Scribblenauts Unlimited in 2012.

They accuse the defendants of "shamelessly using" both Nyan Cat and Keyboard Cat "by name to promote and market their games," and that their "trademark infringement was willful and intentional."

Unfortunately, their argument isn't purr-fectly sound. There's the minor issue that neither copyright was filed until 2010, but the major issue is that Shcmidt and Torres registered their copyright over five years after the videos were published on YouTube, which likely means those copyrights are not legally entitled to a presumption of validity under 17 U.S.C. 410(c).

In other words, hairballs!
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.




comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution