More Reviews
REVIEWS World of Tanks (PS4) Review
Modern warfare shooters are a dime-a-dozen, so why not jump behind the “wheel” of a ten-ton behemoth and incorporate strategy to decimate the enemy?

Attractio Review
In the year 3275, the most exciting thing to do is watch people move boxes around a room. If this truly is the future, please end me now!
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Mighty No. 9
Release date: Out Now

Arslan: The Warriors of Legend
Release date: Out Now

Factotum 90
Release date: Out Now

Aegis of Earth: Protonovus Assault
Release date: 03/01/16


LATEST FEATURES The New Hitman Is Still Hitman, But Its Episodic Nature Might Subdue Reviewers
How will reviewers grade this?

A Skill Tree Build Guide for Every Class in XCOM 2
Punish the alien opposition with perfectly built Grenadiers, Psi Operatives, Rangers, Specialists, and Sharpshooters.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP Ivory_Soul
Windows 10 Review for Dummies
By Ivory_Soul
Posted on 08/11/15
After all these years, and growing up with Windows 3.1, I have seen an entire evolution of computers and software. Touch screens and large resolutions were a pipe dream just 15 years ago. Now it's the norm. Going from a Packard Bell (yes, before HP) that couldn't run 3D Ultra Mini...

GAMING NEWS

Sony Sued for Not Allowing Users to... Sue

Posted on Tuesday, December 20 @ 10:27:06 PST by Keri_Honea

The latest Terms of Service for the PlayStation Network instilled an arbitration clause, which requires all users of the PSN to agree to settle all disputes via arbitration instead of a lawsuit. More specifically, they want to nip class-action lawsuits in the bud.

This set many a-gamer into a rage, even though many didn't quite understand that arbitration will help them more than a class-action suit ever will. Either way, we all know that gamers like to go into rages, and sure enough, a gamer has sued Sony over this arbitration clause.

According to GameSpot, the petition claims the following:
The suit alleges that Sony engaged in unfair business practices by forcing consumers to either give up their right to file a class-action lawsuit or give up access to the online gaming network they effectively paid for when they purchased the hardware.

The suit says Sony buried the clause section describing the changes near the bottom of a 21-page form viewable through the PS3 and neglected to post an easily accessible version of the form online, even though it had done so with past user agreement updates. While the suit notes that Sony allowed an opt out from the class-action provision, the only way for consumers to do that was to contact the company in writing (no emails, phone calls, or online forms accepted) within 30 days.
This suit will most likely go where the last class-action suit went: nowhere. Arbitration clauses are staple in practically every major business contract, because they not only cut down costs for everyone involved, but they also get resolved years faster than a traditional lawsuit in a courtroom and usually with fairer results than 12 jurors could ever hand down.

Either way, I have to wonder if Microsoft will be next, despite the fact that they did offer an opt-out with their newest Terms of Service. Gamers do seem to be sue-happy these days.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.




comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution