More Reviews
REVIEWS Journey (PS4) Review
The critically acclaimed Journey makes the leap to the PS4. Is the PS3 classic still a trek worth taking? Duh.

Rare Replay Review
Rare has had a profound impact on the gaming industry, and this collection is a catalog of its timeless designs.
More Previews
PREVIEWS Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Preview
Fans were mad about Beyond Earth. Rising Tide should fix that.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Goat Simulator
Release date: 08/11/15

Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain
Release date: 09/01/15

NHL 16
Release date: 09/01/15


LATEST FEATURES How ARK: Survival Evolved Is Conquering Steam
Is ARK just another popular survival game, or is there something more behind its surprising level of success?

Buy, Try, Die: August 2015 Release List
Madden NFL 16, Until Dawn, Everybody's Gone to the Rapture: What will you Buy, what will you Try, and what needs to Die?

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oblivion437 Update: I was unfortunately not aware of Shamus Young's severe criticism of Fallout 3 available here to link in the original piece and I regret that.  It dovetails rather nicely with what I've written and it's much better executed than my piece.  I strongly recommend anyone...

GAMING NEWS

Sony Sued for Not Allowing Users to... Sue

Posted on Tuesday, December 20 @ 10:27:06 PST by Keri_Honea

The latest Terms of Service for the PlayStation Network instilled an arbitration clause, which requires all users of the PSN to agree to settle all disputes via arbitration instead of a lawsuit. More specifically, they want to nip class-action lawsuits in the bud.

This set many a-gamer into a rage, even though many didn't quite understand that arbitration will help them more than a class-action suit ever will. Either way, we all know that gamers like to go into rages, and sure enough, a gamer has sued Sony over this arbitration clause.

According to GameSpot, the petition claims the following:
The suit alleges that Sony engaged in unfair business practices by forcing consumers to either give up their right to file a class-action lawsuit or give up access to the online gaming network they effectively paid for when they purchased the hardware.

The suit says Sony buried the clause section describing the changes near the bottom of a 21-page form viewable through the PS3 and neglected to post an easily accessible version of the form online, even though it had done so with past user agreement updates. While the suit notes that Sony allowed an opt out from the class-action provision, the only way for consumers to do that was to contact the company in writing (no emails, phone calls, or online forms accepted) within 30 days.
This suit will most likely go where the last class-action suit went: nowhere. Arbitration clauses are staple in practically every major business contract, because they not only cut down costs for everyone involved, but they also get resolved years faster than a traditional lawsuit in a courtroom and usually with fairer results than 12 jurors could ever hand down.

Either way, I have to wonder if Microsoft will be next, despite the fact that they did offer an opt-out with their newest Terms of Service. Gamers do seem to be sue-happy these days.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.


More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution