More Reviews
REVIEWS Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Review
Borderlands: The-Prequel promises the moon, but does it even get off the ground?

The Evil Within Review
Developer Shinji Mikami wishes for the survival-horror genre. Does The Evil Within make a case?
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Disney Fantasia: Music Evolved
Release date: 10/21/14

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Release date: 11/04/14

Far Cry 4
Release date: 11/18/14

Dragon Age: Inquisition
Release date: 11/18/14


LATEST FEATURES 7 Problems With Kingdom Hearts HD 2.5 ReMIX [Hands-on Preview]
For the last time, Aqua, NO I will not go out with you! (Yes, yes I will, actually.)

Xbox Downloads October 2014 - Updating Each Week
Microsoft's Xbox One console continues an Xbox Live revolution started over a decade ago. Here's hoping Summer of Arcade makes it to the platform next year.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oblivion437
I Don't Want to, but I Have To...
By oblivion437
Posted on 10/20/14
Well, Gamergate has spilled over into the mainstream media and the coverage appears to be nearly uniformly dreadful. Take " What is Gamergate, and What Does It Say About Gender In Video Games? " by David Konnow as an example.  It appears that the writer has done little to no...

GAMING NEWS

Wargaming "Not Happy" With Xbox LIVE Gold Requirement On F2P

Posted on Tuesday, June 25 @ 07:40:05 Eastern by



At Microsoft's E3 Press Conference, it was revealed that Wargaming's free-to-play World of Tanks would be coming to the Xbox 360 as a console-exclusive in addition to the already successful PC version. There's just one thing getting in the way of Wargaming's free-to-play model—Xbox LIVE Gold—and Wargaming CEO Victor Kislyi is "not happy" about it.

Speaking with Gamesindustry.biz, Kislyi had this to say about the Xbox LIVE paywall Wargaming is facing:

With Microsoft, unfortunately it's not 100 per cent free-to-play because it requires the Gold subscription to Xbox Live membership," explains Kislyi. "But that's a Microsoft requirement which is valid for us and for Activision and for EA and all other partners. They cannot drop it for us because they would have to drop it for everyone and it would be a total mess for them.

This we have to tolerate, which I am not happy about. I would rather add another 30-40 million non-golden members and they will monetise occasionally.

It's difficult to define World of Tanks or any game as truly free-to-play if an Xbox LIVE Gold subscription is required.

This is in contrast to Sony's stance on F2P games, even after they announced that PlayStation Plus would be required to play PS4 games online. Sony is allowing F2P games to be played without the PS Plus requirement, making them truly free to play.

What are your thoughts? Does Microsoft need to change their policy on F2P games? Or have they done enough backpedaling on policies lately?

Related Games:   World of Tanks
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.


More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

More On GameRevolution