Sprechen Sie Zombie?
Some things in life are just perversely ironic. Take this one: when I was growing up as a nice Jewish boy in California, I had a recurring fantasy that I could go back in time as the Terminator and kill Hitler, piss on Himmler, and give Albert Spear a Canadian necktie. I eventually came to think that perhaps conflating the MTV-generation's stout unwillingness to accept reality with a healthy dose of 1980's paranoid action fantasies and Michael J. Fox films was not altogether healthy.
As this moment of awakening was upon me and I opened my soul to living in truth, my brother raced into the room and grabbed me off the couch to show me this new game he got. Minutes later, I was blasting away Nazis with the glee of a Stormtrooper-massacring Ewok. That was Wolfenstein 3D, the very first of the first-person shooters.
That was a very long time ago. But it seems that someone else realized that power of nostalgia because they went ahead and finally made a sequel to Wolfenstein 3D, the aptly titled Return to Castle Wolfenstein. What we're dealing with is a good game, a fun game, but strangely a game that, though conceived of nostalgia, doesn't have any real sense of where it came from.
You reprise your role as agent BJ Blazkowicz, sent deep into Germany on some wily scheme by a secretive council of Allied spooks. The alleged plot concerns a Nazi attempt to resurrect an ancient, evil German warlord-sorcerer-blend-o-matic-something. Throughout the game, BJ blasts Nazis, Occult Nazis, Robo Nazis, and even Mummy-Robo-Mutant-Brainfeeding-Clawed-Nazis-With-Poor-Hygeine. This poses a small problem.
Who cares, right? It's a shooter, there are targets, you shoot them, they die, you dance, right? But games are trying more and more to feel like action movies, and movies need good plots...and games need at least buyable ones. Shooting Robocop's grandad in 1944 and eviscerating the Evil Dead during WWII tends to take a player out of their willing suspension of disbelief.
Worse still, Return to Castle Wolfenstein introduces a supernatural evil that is meant to be even worse than the Nazis. The Nazis are the ultimate evil, and making them less vile than anything detracts from their impact and therefore from the fun of shooting them.
Speaking of which, they don't die like they used to. Mention "Mein Lieben!" to any self-respecting PC gamer and you'll get a knowing smile - that's what Nazis screamed as you killed them in Wolf 3D. Here, they speak English. I understand that for story purposes the Nazis often have long conversations that have to be in English, but why extend it over a beloved gaming hallmark? This is the main problem with Return to Castle Wolfenstein - it's so excited about the ways that is differs from Wolf3D that it sacrifices its connection to its past.
But before you get depressed, know that Return to Castle Wolfenstein is not bad; actually, it's mostly solid. If you forget about most of the intangibles, the game does a damn good job of putting you somewhere with a gun and letting it all rip. The graphics (based on Quake 3 tech) are extremely good, easily on the bleeding edge, and the level design is detailed and atmospheric. The weapon selection is good as well, with most of the guns being true to the period except for the Tesla cannon...oh well... it worked for Red Alert.
Above all, Return to Castle Wolfenstein has the right feel as a shooter. The combat is very solid with smart enemy placement and AI that, while not exceptional, makes for some great gunplay. Most of the time, Return to Castle Wolfensteinis much like a stripped-down No One Lives Forever set in WWII and, when it concentrates on being that, succeeds very well.
What really makes it work, though, is the multiplayer. Instead of the usual Deathmatch options, Return to Castle Wolfenstein offers a team-based multiplayer game best described as the meeting of Unreal Tournament's Assault mode and Half-Life'sTeam Fortress. Two teams, Allied and Axis, square off around a fortress, town, or other installation and each have objectives, usually more complicated than just attack/defend. Each player picks a role, either a Soldier (can use any weapon), Medic (can heal dying soldiers), Engineer (can blow up obstacles), or Lieutenant (carries ammo and can call airstrikes). Once you select your role and your weapon, you spawn in with that weapon and keep it unless you die and switch.
This system allows some very intricate strategizing and teamwork. The best games involve a great deal of communication and coordination; the worst ones are free-for-all chaos, which is still good fun. The single player and multiplayer were designed by different developers (Gray Matter and Nerve, respectively), so there isn't a lot of cohesion, but neither is hobbled by the other. The multiplayer alone is worth the price of admission.
But in all, Return to Castle Wolfenstein is not what it could have been. As a story it's utterly bizarre, as a sequel it's sub-par, but as a stand-alone game it's very good. The simple truth is that regardless of the detractions, killing Nazis will always be fun...always. There are few times that you can play a game and feel you made the world a better place. Wolfenstein 3Dwas one of those times. If the world isn't any better after playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein, at least it might brighten your day.