We've all heard the news that Aliens: Colonials Marines is bad, but how bad is it?
Meh. It's not that bad.
Aliens: Colonial Marines is a mix-mash of great design work and poor implementation. It's a Frankenstein of design decisions that are diametrically wonderfully planned out and carefully crafted while making no lick of sense to even the most oblivious layman. It certainly never rises to the height of Gearbox head-Randy
Pitchford's demo video from 2011. So what is it?
First, in the campaign
Aliens: Colonial Marines is a game that plays better with friends. Nothing makes you feel more like Vazquez or Hudson ("Game over, man! Game over!") than running around blowing the crap out of Xenomorphs with three buddies similarly decked out in combat gear. This is casual fun, not a game you play where the challenge demands a team but for the fun of going on a bug hunt through James Cameron's vision of the action world at breakneck speed while everyone flashes pulse-rifle fire willy-nilly.
This extends to the multiplayer, where you can level up your marine or Xenomorph unit with combat upgrades and where play is generally fun on either team. Playing as a marine highlights the need for cooperation, since a single xeno serves up a hot piping plate of tongue-mouthed death to a single marine in short order.
The game does a fine job making you feel like inhabiting the Aliens world, with some design work directly from
Alien—and a couple nods to
Prometheus that look added at the last minute. But they have done their utmost to transport you to James Cameron's
Aliens, fitting your team with another Bishop Unit (voiced by the movie's own Lance Henriksen) and having you dash through the (surprisingly intact) locations of the film and its predecessor. You use the auto-turrets (more on this later), the hip-swivel Smart Guns, and the pulse rifle, and you fight swarms of the generic grunts, lurkers, spitters, facehuggers, and a queen. It has been designed from the ground up to be
Aliens, as much as a video game can be at least.
Unfortunately,
Aliens: Colonial Marines is as ugly as the ballsack-like eggs that house a facehugger. There's no way around that. This is a huge shame because it's clear that the attention to detail in the design beneath the graphics is super-obsessive. One section sends you into the Derelict cruiser from the original
Alien overrun by the evil "Company" Weyland-Utani, and the mix of Syd Mead design style of
Aliens and the creepy H.R. Giger-esque designs of
Alien show an extreme level of dedication to the lore of the franchise.
But in implementation, in the lighting, texturing, character modeling, and animations,
Aliens: Colonial Marines is either an unfinished product or just lazy; it looks like an HD-converted PS2 game with new textures but the exact same architecture. Everything looks chunky, jerky, flat; and on the Xbox 360 there was shearing right from the start. Its processor that by no means should have been taxed clearly was. Characters look ugly, poorly modeled and animated, and for the most part their dialogue in cinematics is delivered with affectless lip-moving with no facial animation.
On top of that, the design problems are generally idiosyncratic and inconsistent. In one area you have to retrieve and place an auto-turret. Up until this point, actions appropriately require pressing the "action button," but here for some reason, arming the auto-turret is done with the "fire" button. It makes no sense, and I had to look for the solution on Gearbox's forums, since the game would not let me progress until I had done so (and it did not offer player training on how to do it). The shooting sections where you face off against Weyland-Utani's PMCs are inconsistent, and the boss fights are just garbage; the endgame where you face off against a queen is particularly unsatisfying. Dialogue in some sections, especially from a conflict between two certain female characters is awful (this may be due to these female characters being a speculated late addition).
And yet you can see that a good game was clearly built in the planning stages of the project. Elements like the audio files that fill in the background are rich and clearly steeped in the lore. The inclusion of a special "marine hostage" from the series franchise in the plot (including the original actor providing the voice) adds a level of authenticity. The clear obsession with the movie's design underlying the poorly implemented graphics and the whirlwind tour through
Aliens and
Alien (and
Prometheus) locations are a bit of a dream for fans of the series. The planning of individual set pieces, from the early spaceship assault to the crash on Planet LV-426, to a survival horror section with no weapons in the sewers, to the Derelict, is strong enough that a little of the game actually shines through.
My immediate thought when I finished it was: "Damn, this game makes me want to play its sequel, where they'll have fixed all the problems!"
Colonial Marines doesn't exactly have a cliffhanger, but it is clearly open for a continuation. While the Xbox 360, PS3, and PC versions are all available, the Wii U port has been delayed until March, with no firm release date. Perhaps Gearbox is scrambling to fix the problems inherent in the game, much as the one-time Wii U exclusive
Ninja Gaiden 3: Razor's Edge was the version of the game that players actually wanted. Still, time will tell.
Aliens: Colonial Marines is not the bad game that most reviewers have made it out to be. With the reviews it's been getting, you would think it was unplayable! However, the hoax that Pitchford sold with his video demo two years ago has clearly poisoned the well. Everyone seems to want to know: Where is that game? With
Colonial Marines supposedly outsourced, all the talent went to
Borderlands 2, I guess.
Review based on X360 version. Copy provided by publisher.
sliverstorm
Joined: Jun 2007
Alex_Osborn
Joined: Jan 2012
sliverstorm
Joined: Jun 2007
OdiousLupous
Joined: Jul 2011
R0ADK1LL
Joined: Jul 2009
Jonathan_Leack
Joined: Jan 2012
NecroWolf
Joined: Oct 2005
OdiousLupous
Joined: Jul 2011
elmoreoocyte
Joined: Apr 2012
Jonathan_Leack
Joined: Jan 2012
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
oblivion437
Joined: Nov 2006
elmoreoocyte
Joined: Apr 2012
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
But either way, as humans, we're all gonna differ on these things. Blake apparently really likes this game even though a lot of people don't. The fact that he spent the last two paragraphs talking about sequels and resources and other peoples' reviews is indicative of his fandom, and that's just part of being alive. ^_^
I too enjoy a lot of games that most people would hate, and I've hated my share of universally praised titles. I can dig.
NecroWolf
Joined: Oct 2005
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
blake_peterson
Joined: Oct 2011
Colonial Marines, like a lot of games I don't regard particularly well, was profoundly average. It wasn't broken enough to warrant extreme attention. It had amazing pre-production work clearly thrown into a shredder as it's production cycle; I'd love to see that pay off, but I'm not holding my breath, and cancelled my Wii U preorder.
I expect that if it does sell enough units to garner a sequel, Gearbox will have to give it a much higher priority due to the bad publicity this go-around. Like I've said, I think the media hype around this game hurt it so much more than the actual gameplay itself.
drathbone
Joined: May 2011
NecroWolf
Joined: Oct 2005
drathbone
Joined: May 2011
CaptainPicard
Joined: Sep 2010
xDUMPWEEDx
Joined: Jan 2012
OdiousLupous
Joined: Jul 2011
WILLS_COOL_MODE
Joined: Oct 2010
sliverstorm
Joined: Jun 2007
blake_peterson
Joined: Oct 2011
The answer is yes. The game functions, nothing is totally broken. It is not an F. I actually even had fun playing it. Not like the fun I had playing other profoundly average shooters (the original Battlefield: Bad Company, for instance, was a blast) I even enjoyed Haze (which was a worse game) a bit more than this, but it was still enjoyable for the most part.
I sincerely feel that the reason this game has received such poor reviews is that it has been caught up in bad publicity that overshadowed the game itself. At no point did the game crash, did I feel that I was in a situation where the design was horribly broken, or was I offended by design choices. I decided to review it as I saw it, outside of the hype, as an average game.
Jobin_Wendy
Joined: Mar 2012
Second, where and what do you teach?
Jobin_Wendy
Joined: Mar 2012
Not spam.
Sourdeez
Joined: Feb 2012
Jobin_Wendy
Joined: Mar 2012
Blake, let's write an Aliens sequel together and pitch it to Gearbox. Then we can suggest what studio they outsource to.
blake_peterson
Joined: Oct 2011
It'd be like a reverse version of L.A. Noire, where instead of discovering lies, you have to lie effectively to everyone for the benefit of the Company. Do your job right, and most of the Marines die, but you get some pet Aliens to take back to Weyland-Utani for them take back to the lab to develop into super-weapons.
Jobin_Wendy
Joined: Mar 2012
It could be like an updated, xenocentric version of Tecmo's Deception, which sounds awesome on paper (or... on a screen, whatever).
reiandcoke
Joined: Jul 2011
oblivion437
Joined: Nov 2006
Bobert
Joined: Nov 2007
pagerankprofile
Joined: Feb 2013
Anthony_Severino
Joined: Oct 2010
Barth_Vader
Joined: Nov 2005
Jobin_Wendy
Joined: Mar 2012
friggest
Joined: Mar 2008
Yossarian29
Joined: Jul 2008
blake_peterson
Joined: Oct 2011
As a matter of fact, I generally think that unless I give something a 4 or higher, it's not a recommendation. A 3.5 might be a mixed bag, but Aliens: Colonial Marines, for all I enjoyed parts of it, didn't even receive that. It received a 3, consigning it to a purgatory of generic shooters that do nothing to distinguish themselves, not even being truly bad.
BigTruckSeries
Joined: May 2006
#1 AvP (2010) was so poorly designed considering how AvP (1999) was SO EXCELLENT. You'd think the developers would simply go back, take a look at the 99' game and build on that...in fact, A DIRECT PORT would have been acceptably considering a large amount of gamers didn't have a gaming PC back in those days and thus never played AvP Gold.
#2 Why AvP2 (2001) had to be overscripted and thus feel not as good as AvP(1999).
The missing key is EXPLORATION. It's what seperated Doom and Duke Nukem 3D and Quake 2 from all these newer games with nothing but scripted cinematic intros, outros, etc. You can't explorer anymore - you just follow a linear path now.
#3 HOW THEY COULD F*** this game up - considering how AvP (2010) was recieved. After seeing poor reviews for AvP (2010) you'd think they'd WAKE UP AND GET IT RIGHT.
I wrote a lengthy review of my feelings on AvP 2010 on G.R. (in my profile). I liked the singleplayer and multiplayer, but the mu
BigTruckSeries
Joined: May 2006
I just hope they get CRYSIS 3 right cause I'm NOT IMPRESSED by the multiplayer beta. It feels like DLC for Crysis 2.
friggest
Joined: Mar 2008
Also mulitplayer survival mode with aliens and marines was probably the closest anyone has gotten the movie to the game correct.
friggest
Joined: Mar 2008
blake_peterson
Joined: Oct 2011
spartan317
Joined: Dec 2005
CaptainPicard
Joined: Sep 2010