More Reviews
REVIEWS Firefall Review
Repetitive gameplay makes this fall a little boring.

The Walking Dead: Season Two Review
At this point, you’re not coming back for the zombies. Let’s get down to business.
More Previews
PREVIEWS Geometry Wars 3: Dimensions Preview
Put up some movie glasses, because Geometry Wars is entering the third dimension.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Destiny
Release date: 09/09/14

FIFA 15
Release date: 09/23/14

Ar Nosurge: Ode to an Unborn Star
Release date: 09/23/14

Persona 4 Arena Ultimax
Release date: 09/30/14


LATEST FEATURES And I Was All "Hell Yeah I'll Play a New Dreamcast Game"
I just played a Dreamcast game that was released in... wait, 2014?

A Comprehensive Guide to Dealing with Controversy in the Video Game Industry
Need help wading through the latest misogyny/homophobia/racism/corruption debate in the gaming industry? Paul Tamburro’s here to help!
MOST POPULAR FEATURES The Updating List of PAX Indies
We're heading to PAX Prime! Are you looking to check out a few unique indie games while you're there? UPDATED: Dragon Fin Soup, Dungeon of the Endless,

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP samsmith614 Since game design is a business, I decided to see what's really selling well for the PS4. I did this search a week ago, and at the time, out of the top 20 bestsellers on Amazon 10 had not even been released yet. By now some have been released. But others still have not. And yet others...

Command & Conquer: Red Alert -- Counterstrike Review

By:
Johnny_Lee
06/05/04
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION
EMAIL TO A FRIEND
GENRE Strategy 
PLAYERS 1- 4 
PUBLISHER Westwood Studios 
DEVELOPER Intelligent Games 
RELEASE DATE  
MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
T What do these ratings mean?

"Firms maximize profit."

It is only natural for companies to make money, that's why they exist. Once in a while, companies produce a bad product, and that's normal. Sometimes however, some big computer game company gets greedy, tries to duplicate some of its past success, and sells a pathetic extension of a once popular game to devoted fans. Then some game reviewer, who also happens to be a loyal fan, gets really pissed off because: 1. Memory of once awesome game now tainted forever. 2. Disappointed in company (so much for brand loyalty). 3. Had to endure playing a bad game because it's his job. Then he bashes the company and exposes its sham to everyone on the world wide web. Here goes...

Red Alert Counterstrike boasts 16 brand new missions, over 100 new multiplayer maps, 4 new units, 8 new songs, and the Red Alert Win95 Desktop Theme Pack. It all sounds good, but... Who wants to play 16 new missions when there's nothing special about them? Of the sixteen, only a few of them contain missions where you can use these "special new units". These new units are a one time deal. Once they die, they never come back. You're not allowed to build them, and you can only use them for that one mission. Sure Tesla Tanks sound cool. I remember suggesting that to one of my friends long ago. I thought it would be a bomb. Instead, Westwood made some stupid looking tank that had the abilities of the Tesla coil. Gee, that must have been real difficult recycling. Then there's this super jet that can drop nuclear missiles. Once again, it was just a picture of a Mig superimposed with a nuclear detonation (the same explosion in multiplayer nuclear blasts). Last and probably least, there were the "Super" Soldier and his "Super" K-9 bitch. Recycled pictures of your usual soldier and dog that had more life and did more damage. Oh, and the dog can jump really far when he attacks. Yeah, give them a bone for that.

What made Command and Conquer such a great success was the gameplay and the video sequences that went along with the story. In this extension, there is no story and no video sequences. You are allowed to just pick any mission you want, since none of them are related. Westwood actually claims this "free choice" as a special feature, as if it is something to drool over. What about the "over 100 new multiplayer maps"? As I recall, Warcraft II allowed the player to design the maps with a map creating feature, and it came with the game. An infinite number of new maps. Should we also be grateful for paying to play an old game on new ground?

For the die hard Command and Conquer fans, Westwood published Command and Conquer Gold couple months ago. This was a remake of the first C&C that supported Win95 and had similar graphics to Red Alert. It also came with a desktop theme pack. Maybe we could let that recycled game slide because it did have improved graphics, and it was targeted at people who never played C&C or fans who wanted to play it again and collect the nice desktop stuff. Counterstrike on the other hand, requires the additional purchase of Red Alert. The few background pics could have just been downloaded and the icons weren't so hot either. So what's the deal here? Just because we like C&C and bought the sequel doesn't mean we're going to buy 16 extra tedious missions, not like Red Alert wasn't already wearing thin in an industry where the life expectancy of a game is just as long as the latest hardware.

Hopefully this is the last time Westwood will try to milk consumers with the same C&C junk. Everyone may have loved it the first time around, but now it's just an annoying jingle that won't go away. This is an utter disappointment, much less a counterstrike. Makes you wonder who wrote this, the summer interns? What about those new soundtracks, you say? I wouldn't know since I'd actually have to play the game again to hear 'em...

D Revolution report card
  • Boring Missions for a game you ALREADY OWN
  • Limited Desktop Themes
  • Old "New" Units
  • No story, no goal, just wasting time

More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

 


More information about Command & Conquer: Red Alert -- Counterstrike


More On GameRevolution