Someone needs to watch more Sopranos.
When the original Gangsters
hit the scene a while
back, it caught everyone's attention with its interesting subject matter. Then
we all tried to play it. If insanely complex micromanagement is your idea of
a gangsta's paradise, then you probably liked it. The rest of us didn't.
So along comes Gangsters 2
, which tries to streamline some of the rougher
bits from the original to make the game more accesible. Too bad they didn't
make it more fun.
The game starts out interestingly enough. It's the prohibition era, and you're
a fellow named Joey Bane. You live in a state called New Temperance, which is
ironically bursting with gangsters and all sorts of mob activity. Your pop,
who's got a reputation as a family man (even though he looks like he'd kill
his own momma), gets iced by some gangsters, and you wanna get some payback.
While there's room for ethical dilemmas with this type of plot (just look at
Star Wars and Hamlet), there are no ethical choices or factors in this game.
You're bad, the enemy is bad too, and soon somebody is gonna get dead. Real
The game progresses through fifteen different counties, spread between twenty
different episodes. Each episode involves a different set of objectives, which
usually involves taking over another gangster's turf and then killing said gangster.
The gameplay is as direct and linear as the plot. It's divided into two areas:
economics and fighting. The economic side is simple. You secure some operations
that'll make you money, and you defend them until you've got the resources to
Expansion is measured by the buildings you control; in gaining buildings you
not only gain income, but also influence over most of the surrounding area.
Unfortunately, all this "influence" really amounts to is having enemies turn
into easily visible yellow dots on the map screen once they enter your zone.
In order to defend buildings you hire "muscle" from the local gyms. The process
is easy enough - just tell a building to hire a given number of muscle, and
it does. The muscle stands in front of the building and fights any baddie who
comes too close. Sometimes they win, sometimes they lose, sometimes they just
stand around and let your building get wrecked. You have no control over them
whatsoever. This sucks.
Now, if the muscle were radically intelligent and useful, I wouldn't mind not
being able to control them. But they're retarded. Everything in Gangsters
which falls under the dominion of AI suffers from chronic bouts of absurdity
and general randomness.
Did I mention that everything
in Gangsters 2
is controlled by
AI? Even the stuff you think you control is really controlled by an insane computer
brain, making all units prone to arbitrary madness. Say, for example, you're
driving down the street in your car with your Gs, and you see a bunch of enemy
muscle milling around outside a casino up ahead. You know if you drive past
them they'll shoot you, so you decide you probably shouldn't go over there.
You tell the driver, "Hey, turn the car around, those bums'll try to scratch
my ride." Now, one of three things could happen: 1) the driver could turn the
car around; 2) the driver could drive past the thugs (who would promptly shoot
at you), turn around way the hell down the street, and drive past the thugs
again and 3) at any point during step two the driver could pull over in front
of the thugs, and start firing back.
Only one of the options never
occurs, and it's the first one.
This is because there's no "Turn the $#%& car around!" command or option. All
you can do is make suggestions. Did any mob boss ever just make suggestions
Some may say that the strategy gameplay doesn't lend itself to such direct
control. "You're not controlling the car, you can only make suggestions which
the NPCs have to carry out." Fine. But when the NPCs are dumber than a bag full
of hammers, it sort of breaks everything. and 2) what about when my character,
Joey Bane, is driving the car? He's me, I'm him, so where's the breakdown in
The combat in Gangsters 2
is very disappointing. The game includes a
pause feature to allow the player to issue commands and keep up with the computer,
but when your control is as limited as it is here, you don't need to pause the
game, because the computer is doing everything for you anyway.
The units themselves are horribly shallow. They can either shoot each other
or run away if they start to get messed up. There's no hiding behind cover,
no climbing up on rooftops - just bang, bang, bang. There are some big shoot-outs
and drive-bys, but each takes all the skill and mastery of tying your shoes.
Guess what you do if you're not fighting? You're waiting. You wait for your
money to increase so you can buy more stuff, or you watch for enemies to come
and try to sabotage
your stuff. You get paid by the hour, and each hour
takes a full minute. Need 900 bucks? Only make a hundred every hour? That's
nine minutes of either raw, raunchy nothing, or frustrating, removed fighting.
If you're not doing anything, you're probably looking at the map screen, which
is the most tactically advantageous screen (of three) in the game. From here
you can see all the gangsters that are on the streets in the entire county,
who they are, what they do, and who they're associated with. As if that weren't
enough, anything that can be done from the regular street level screen can be
done from the map screen as well.
While both screens have their advantages, the street level scene being far
more interesting to look at. Switching between the two is very discombobulating.
Generally, a map screen gives you some sort of square or rectangle that tells
you what you'll be looking at when you leave
the map screen. This rectangle
exists in Gangsters 2
as well, but those zany developers at Hot House
have hidden it. In order to find it you've got to press F11. Not exactly what
I'd call straightforward or intuitive.
Graphically, Gangsters 2
almost works. All the townspeople run smoothly
and the colors are fine and there's very little choppiness. However, the camera
is extremely fixed; there's no rotation and no zooming. If you want a bigger
picture, you go to the map screen. And, since you almost always want the bigger
picture, you spend most of your time on the map screen, which is about as graphically
impressive as a game made in 1992.
The sounds are decent, except for the fact that you'll hear things and have
no idea where they came from, what they meant, or how to find out. All sounds
at all distances sound the same, making it difficult to judge the locations
of firefights and robberies without consulting the map. However, the gun noises
are decent, and even better is the fact that you can actually discern several
different gun sounds at the same time. As a result, a little firefight sounds
just like what it is, while a serious massacre has all the clatter and chaos
that every serious massacre should.
seems like the result of the people at HotHouse Creations
completely misinterpreting criticism for the original Gangsters
The real problem with Gangsters
wasn't that it needed to be less of a
game; it just needed better combat to balance out the socio-economic half. Gangsters
just guts the administration and throws in a huge quantity of low quality
combat, making for a pretty lame game. Let's strap some cement boots on this
one and let it sleep with the fishes.