More Reviews
REVIEWS God of War Collection (Vita) Review
God of War brings its PS2 heritage to Vita, and the results are more than a bit baffling.

Dark Souls II: Crown of the Sunk Review
I was confident in my Dark Souls abilities. Then From Software released new Dark Souls II DLC.
More Previews
PREVIEWS Pillars of Eternity Preview
For Obsidian's crowdfunded love letter to Infinity Engine games like Icewind Dale and Baldur's Gate, I was impressed by its willingness to pull back the curtain and let me see the machinery behind it.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES CounterSpy
Release date: 08/19/14

Tales of Xillia 2
Release date: 08/19/14

Plants Vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare
Release date: 08/19/14

MotoGP 14
Release date: 09/01/14


LATEST FEATURES Water, Water Everywhere: 15 of the Best Water Worlds in Gaming
Lots of water worlds suck, but not these ones, and they're completely Kevin Costner-free.

An Updating List of PlayStation 4 Updates We Want
Sony and Microsoft have been updating their consoles regularly, but we wanted to share our own ideas for updating the PS4 firmware.
MOST POPULAR FEATURES Picking Your Gender: 5 Industry Professionals Discuss Queer Identity in Gaming
Women from Naughty Dog, ArenaNet, Harmonix, and Gamespot unite to talk about what they want from games in terms of diversity.
 
Coming Soon

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP oneshotstop
Call of Duty will never be the same
By oneshotstop
Posted on 07/28/14
       We've all been there. Everyone remembers that mission. You and your partner are climbing up the mountains in the snow, striving to pull some slick clandestine operation about getting some intel on a bad guy, or something similar (because let's face...

Microsoft CFS Review

Johnny_B By:
Johnny_B
11/01/98
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION
EMAIL TO A FRIEND
GENRE  
PLAYERS 98- 98 
PUBLISHER Microsoft 
DEVELOPER  
RELEASE DATE  
MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

"Microsoft's Return Of The Violent Flight Sim!"

Any of you remember the original Flight Simulator from back in the early eighties? Are you with me? It had a little WW2 flight game built in. Using FS 1's rudimentary graphics you could fly around a little area, supposedly a WW2 battleground, and shoot a few other planes or bomb your enemy's hangars and bunkers. It was very, very basic. In fact, the only thing that separated the two sides was a little line, symbolizing a river, drawn right down the middle.

Well, now we have the sequel to that component of Flight Sim 1.0, and predictably it's called Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator. Flight Simulator has always enjoyed an odd popularity. For some reason, its bad graphics and lack of any real focus or plot never detracted heavily from its sales numbers. Probably, it was one of those games that was just far enough from being a "real game" (READ: Violent, Needlessly Violent, Unrealistic, Juvenile, and More Fun Than Sex) so that middle aged yuppies could play it without thinking they were wasting their time with less than intellectual pursuits.

It's similar to the difference between those who fly planes in their spare time and those who jump out of planes in their spare time. So here we have a WW2 Flight sim designed mainly for the same crowd. Before the combat aspects of this game are even taken into consideration, most Microsoft Flight Simulator fans are going to like this one simply because it's basically a graphical update and a new scenery pack for Flight Simulator 98.

In the game you are presented with four ways to fly, Free Flight, Instant Combat, Single Mission, and Campaign. Free Flight is the mode that most MSFS fans will be familiar with: pick any plane, any place, and aimlessly fly around. Instant Combat is similar, except that you fly against enemy planes that come at you in arcade like waves (major loss of realism). Single Mission is where you fly any one mission from any of the campaigns in any of the planes (including a few from WW1, why?). Finally Campaign is just your regular pre-scripted campaign where you may fly for either the USAF (Which actually didn't exist at the time, back in WW2 it was called the US Army Air Corps, USAAC), the British Royal Air Force (RAF), or the German Luftwaffe.

One of the game's major flaws is that the campaign mode is about as stale and non-immersive as you can get. Basically all you have is a bunch of strung together missions with minimal continuity and only text briefings to flesh things out. This does next to nothing to draw the player into the game. Considering the immense narrative depth that any decent writer can achieve using the dramatic backdrop of WW2, this sort of stale experience is a puzzling letdown.

Now, the graphics are very nice. MSCFS leaps ahead of Flight Simulator 98 like an Olympic long jumper on steroids. The textures on the ground are near photorealistic, even though they are tile based, almost looking as good as those found in Flight Unlimited 2. Furthermore they look decent at anywhere from 500 feet up which is fairly impressive. The terrain is simply much better than previous Flight Simulator titles.

The buildings in the cities are nicely done, those that are tall enough to be modeled that is. The planes are very sharp and detailed, they even lose shrapnel when you shoot 'em. One complaint I do have is that in the cities only the tallest buildings and monuments are modeled in 3D. I don't know about all of you, but to me, flying over a flat texture with only the Le Tour Eiffel and L'Arc de Triumph popping up is not a convincing simulation of flying over Paris.

On the other hand, one nice thing about all of this is that MSCFS will run well on any decently equipped PC and supports almost all D3D compatible accelerator cards.

As far as the actual gameplay goes, MSCFS is fairly bland and uninspiring. The first time I hopped into a North American P51-D and took to the skies in 'Instant Combat' I must have downed at least 25 Messerchmitts, which is far to easy and non-dramatic. The main problem is with the enemy AI, as soon as you get on their tails they basically fly in a straight line until you pump their asses full of hot lead.

The flight modeling is also not as realistic as Flight Simulator patrons have come to expect from their beloved series. Roll rate and Pitch rate are fairly lax and the defining elements of any simulation, like say… landings, are a tad bit too easy.

Now, since this is a Flight Simulator game, Microsoft has left the plug in architecture found in their previous efforts. In fact, you can take any plane from MSFS 98 or any add on, and pop 'em in the game. MSCFS automatically straps a pair of machine guns to 'em and lets you go off and kill in a Cessna 172 or an Extra ES 300, for instance. While occasionally fun, this shreds the last feeling of historical accuracy the game has.

Multiplayer is decent, basically it's the same combat, just with opponents who don't seem to be so eager for rear entry. Multiplayer is supported over the modem to modem, serial cable, modem to modem, IPX, TCP/IP, and over Microsoft's The Zone internet gaming service.

To lay it down straight, if you really, really like the Flight Simulator series then you'll probably want to run out to the store like a lemming and drop $50 on it. However, with the impending releases of such innovative titles as Jane's WW2 and PARSOFT's Fight Squadron: Screaming Demons Over Europe, you'll probably do better to hold off on this one and wait for the big boys to land.

C+ Revolution report card
  • Sweet Graphics
  • Flight Sim Fans Will Like It
  • Reasonably FUN
  • Lax Flight Model/Bad A.I.
  • Unconvincing Cities
    Reviews by other members
    No member reviews for the game.

More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

 


More information about Microsoft CFS


More On GameRevolution