More Reviews
REVIEWS Boss! Review
PlayStation Vita owners looking to exercise a little frustration can look to this rather low-fi title about creating a monster and destroying everything in your path.

KINGDOM HEARTS HD 2.5 ReMIX Review
Part 2 of Square-Enix and Disney's cooperative compilation cash-cow is ready to milk the series for another go, but does the milk taste sweet or is it spoiled?
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN-
Release date: Out Now

Kalimba
Release date: Out Now

Persona 5
Release date: 12/31/14

Motorcycle Club
Release date: 01/01/15


LATEST FEATURES Downloadable Content Walks the Line Between Fun and Frenzied in Middle-earth
I don’t even care all that much for the Lords of the Rings brand, which makes the content falling under Shadow of Mordor’s Season Pass a pleasant surprise.

Ugly Christmas Sweaters for Gamers
If this awful trend is going to persist, you may as well do it your way.

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP KevinS
RIP Ralph Baer (1922-2014)
By KevinS
Posted on 12/07/14
RIP Ralph Baer (1922-2014) I really, really hate writing obits. I really do. But I take it as a personal honor to be able to say good things about the men and women I respect, whether in this industry or just in my life, and Ralph Baer is the reason all of this exists in the first...

Order of War Review

T_Bell-Edwards By:
T_Bell-Edwards
01/21/10
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION
EMAIL TO A FRIEND
GENRE RTS 
PLAYERS 1- 4 
PUBLISHER Square Enix 
DEVELOPER Wargaming.net 
RELEASE DATE  
MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
T Contains Mild Language, Violence

What do these ratings mean?

War... war sometimes changes ever-so-slightly.


I'd like to applaud the developers of Order of War for trying to up the sensationalist ante on the WWII real-time strategy genre. I don't mean that sarcastically: The Wargaming.net-developed, Square-Enix-published Order of War is saturated with attempts to make individual moments resonate with a more casual audience, without forsaking the tactical depth that creates a loyal following of RTS fans. Each of the 18 missions (divided into two campaigns - one American, one German) is brimming with dynamic set-pieces, varied objective types, and a shifting focus that appear to be attempting to convey that this is a new breed of strategy game, intended to create a unique experience.

click to enlargeOrder of War sets itself apart from other RTS titles by its single-player campaigns. Every mission is divided into a series of objectives, each of which might involve anything from directing an array of forces at multiple targets to directing the fire of a single small group strategically. You move through key moments in a huge battle, all the while controlling groups of units rather than micromanaging individual troops. In this way, you're always kept feeling like everything you do counts, and that you're at the heart of an epic conflict. This is further enhanced by a cinematic camera that, when activated, zooms into the fray, giving you a close-up of the consequences of your choices and accentuating the feeling of command.

At the same time, common tropes of the genre are held (I mean, besides the infuriatingly generic title). Controls will be familiar to anyone who's played a strategy game in the last ten years - left-click to select, right-click to issue orders, and a selection of modifiers that can be accessed either via hotkeys or an elegantly unobtrusive user interface. The upgrade system adds a layer of complexity, though it is equally as familiar. In a nod to either the potential Japanese audience (given that this is a Square Enix game) or the old-school strategy audience (given that this game appears to be trying to please everyone), there's an option to pause the action and parcel out orders, emulating a turn-based game scheme.

The problem is that Order of War doesn't go beyond run-of-the-mill strategy-based action. The relatively quickly-paced shifts in setting are bereft of any sort of emotional development or polish in presentation. The cinematic camera is a double-edged sword: It adds a welcome relief from the static top-down view, doing an excellent job of immersing you in the action, but also shows off the limits of the graphics engine. As detailed as the animation work is, the seams are more apparent because of clipping issues and small graphical glitches. Annoyingly gruff voice-over work and a soundtrack that takes a page from the most banal side of "triumphant classical orchestra" don't help draw you into the experience.

click to enlargeThe streamlined aspects of the single-player campaigns that might attract those unfamiliar with real-time strategy games prove to be major issues in multiplayer. The lack of depth is disheartening. For instance, the developers have chosen to eliminate a "Fog of War" effect, which would normally hide your enemy's movements and allow for surprise maneuvers. While this is a boon to the solo game--it increases your sense of omniscience and keeps the pace moving briskly--it completely precludes an entire layer of strategy one would use against human opponents. Though the multiplayer still remains fun, it loses its luster in contrast to games (say, Company of Heroes) with more varied multiplayer modes and better community support.

Although there's no small amount of ambition on display, It's readily apparent that limited production values and adherence to tried-and-true methods cause Order of War to fall short of its target.
C+ Revolution report card
  • Easily accessible
  • Engaging single-player
  • Generic presentation
  • Limited multiplayer
    Reviews by other members
    No member reviews for the game.


More from the Game Revolution Network




comments powered by Disqus

 


More information about Order of War