I'll be in the Brewery . . . hic!
Most people I know, including myself, had never heard of a little game called
before. Surprisingly, the game has been around for years, and
has now returned in its third incarnation. While Settlers III
the new dominating real-time strategy game, it still delivers an innovative
and fun experience.
graphics and sound are interesting, most strategy buffs want to know how much
thinking they'll have to do in order to win. In Settlers 3
, you have
to change your thinking. While there is a lot of resource management, every
strategy player has a handle on that by now. You also have to build units, but
everyone knows about that too. What's different is the building order.
, for example, you need a Covert Ops
and a Science Lab to build a nuclear bomb. Settlers III
takes a somewhat
more complex approach. To get usable wood, you need one settler to grow trees,
one to harvest, and finally a woodmill to make boards out of it. To feed your
people, you need to build farms - the fields actually grow as you play. To get
the military unit you want, you have to mine metal ore, smelt it, and then transfer
it to a blacksmith to build your implements of war. This level of complexity sets
apart from other real-time strategy games.
Strategy aside, graphics are an important part of a good game. And while Settlers
doesn't throw the most amazing effects at you, it still holds its own
against today's standards. Though it lacks the effects of StarCraft
the 3D appeal of Total Annihilation
, the bright and
colorful sprites look interesting and are well animated.
Sound is equally decent, but not spectacular. You'll mostly be hearing mining
and chopping sounds anyway - not the most interesting fare.
while taking a back seat to the gameplay, follows three demigods. These gods
have become fat in their rich lands, their people working for them and producing
many goods. They represent three different peoples, Asian, Roman, and Egyptian.
Their master, the "main" god, has found them to be lazy and decides to have
a little game. They must battle each other, the victor winning the favor of
That's where you come in - you are the person, chosen by your god, to lead
your people to battle. Three battling races (many will draw comparisons to Starcraft
or Age of Empires
) but lets remember that the
came out even before Warcraft
is also the first in the series to include massive multiplayer
gaming. While the interface succeeds in being both accessible and powerful -
joining games is a tedious task. After receiving multiple time-outs and other
network errors, I finally got into a game. The game was filled with lag as well
as having another major problem - even without internet latency, the games are
inherently slow. While Settlers III
works well as a single player game,
building up a civilization does not lead to quick "rush" games. An experienced
player warned me of games that never end as well as games that run so long they
go out of sync.
The number of users playing Settlers
is decent, but not overwhelming.
Peak hours saw about fifty or so people playing the game. However, for the most
part the multiplayer is a disaster - you must dedicate hours and hours of play
just to complete one game, hours that many people do not have, especially not
in a single stretch.. If you are looking for a quick fix, look somewhere else.
For a game that succeeds so well as a single player game, it really is a disappointment
that the multiplayer is so bad. Settlers III
is an interesting, fairly
innovative real-time strategy game, so if playing against the computer is your
bag, well then baby, get this game. On the other hand, if you crave the excitement
of biological opponents, don't settle for this one.