5 Reasons Black Ops II Is Best On Wii UPosted on Thursday, October 18 @ 11:30:00 Eastern by Daniel Bischoff
![]() The other week, Nintendo invited me up to San Francisco to play a bunch of Wii U games and generally get a better feel for the system in the weeks leading up to its launch. In addition to U Sing, a handful of 3DS games, ZombiU, and plenty of time with Nintendo Land, I got to try my hand at a quick multiplayer match against some bots in Call of Duty: Black Ops II. When I got home, I went to Gamestop and changed my preorder from Xbox 360 to Wii U. Here are five reasons why. Touch Screen KillstreaksI'm a little too nervous to fiddle with my rewards in the middle of combat. I always feel like I'll be at risk if I hesitate even a second. Not so with the Wii U's GamePad. That big touchscreen puts visual icons next to your right thumb for easy access. This meant I didn't have to move my left thumb from the analog stick to the D-pad and back again. Instead, I could simply tap the icon on the right-hand-side next to the map, as if I were climbing over cover or switching weapons. I didn't have to hit up or down to select the Hunter Killer Drone over my tier-3 killstreak reward. What's more, the touchscreen was easier to reach with my right thumb than the D-pad was, adding to the in-game convenience. ![]() True Split Screen Gaming
My brother and I never bothered to fight over first or second player, but I'm sure that dispute will be unavoidable when it comes to choosing who gets to play on the TV and who gets the GamePad screen all to themselves. With the Wii U GamePad, you don't have to miss out on half of your field of view, just because you have a friend over.
Comments
Post a Comment
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this article.
|
|
| More On GameRevolution | |
xDUMPWEEDx
Joined: Jan 2012
2. No DLC. Nintendo isn't allowing DLC releases like on the 360/PS3 versions. This is a great example of why Nintendo is clueless when trying to bring back core gamers.
So basically, the Wii U port is going to be the worst version available for the core gamer.
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
Elite or not, DLC or not, my number one factor is being able to play on the GamePad. I'm still very excited for that.
TheJx4
Joined: Jun 2011
1. No. I don't even want to use the Gamepad to play an FPS. And calling in a killstreak isn't a tedious or time consuming task, and it happens really fast from what I've seen of Black Ops II.
2. That's not split-screen. True split screen gaming is what you get on PS3/360. This is dual screen.
3. Not really a reason to pick Wii U version over the others. But I agree that Treyarch is top dog, and their last two Wii ports were handled very well.
4. Once again, not a reason to pick the Wii U version over the others. CoD is too fasted paced for, ya know, looking down during the heat of battle to check a map.
5. I guess this is a valid reason, but I personally don't want to play a console-FPS on such a small screen.
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
1. OK, note that this is just my opinion. You're entitled to your own.
2. Semantics.
3. Reason enough for me!
4. Reason enough for me!
5. It looked great to me.
Look, I am a completely different kind of Call of Duty player than you. I get that many people wouldn't play the game if not for the competitive aspect, but for me, I could do with out all that. Black Ops II will have a much friendlier community on Wii U, and that's good enough for me. I like the extra features, even if they are a matter of convenience.
damo_rox619
Joined: Jan 2007
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
213EDD
Joined: Sep 2007
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
Jonathan_Leack
Joined: Jan 2012
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
sliverstorm
Joined: Jun 2007
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
JunkyArd
Joined: Aug 2006
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
Capt_Dastardly
Joined: Sep 2011