5 Reasons Square Enix Is Facing Financial RuinPosted on Thursday, May 26 @ 10:27:49 Eastern by Heath_Hindman
![]() I used to work for an English school in Japan that wanted to publish its own book series. The teaching staff reviewed it and took note of its countless errors, nonsensical lessons, and even instances of Oxford Press plagiarism. "Miyuki," we urged the owner in a meeting, "We have to delay publishing until next semester so that we can fix this." These books were beyond awful. The lady, seeing only visions of dancing money, sent the books to be published in their current form, allowing no teacher intervention. It didn't take long for customers to notice how bad they were and begin complaining, fulfilling the prophecies of the teachers. Sadly, Square Enix has been demonstrating this same stubbornness and disregard for quality assurance lately, and this year, it's going to end up costing them $150 million in losses. For every The World Ends With You, there's a Last Remnant or an Infinite Undiscovery. Let's take a look at the main reasons for this. Financial Fantasy Bore-teenFinal Fantasy XIV was, as admitted by the company's numerous public apologies, a rush job. Hang on. This is a serious business crime in my book. I'll let a company slide on cutting some corners once in a while -- it's a human thing to do, and every single person in the world does it at work, at some point. Don't lie, this includes me and you. But me not putting a cover sheet on my TPS Report can't compare to the failings of Final Fantasy XIV. These were not just corners that were cut; they were slashes right down the middle, veritable axe chops to the chest of what could have and should have been a solid MMO. Yeah, yeah, haters gonna hate Final Fantasy XI, but heck, as someone who used to play MMORPGs as a job, it was one I actually enjoyed and came back to once in a while. I even might be playing it right now if I weren't so busy bitching about other games online. FFXIV spent months being unplayable and is still operating for free due to the overwhelming amount of ass packed into Eorzea. I'm not alone when I declare that my anaconda don't want none unless you got fun, hon'. Right now, most people are not sprung on FFXIV, for good reason. ![]() Now, where that comes into play here is that people are not as mindless as Square Enix apparently expected them to be. I can see how, in that position, executives might have wanted to launch in September regardless of how obviously incomplete it was, fully confident that the Final Fantasy name would sell itself. They're right - the franchise has had a way of selling itself this last decade or so, but not when there's a subscription fee involved. People bailed out on the game and reviewers slaughtered it, leading not only to sales below expectations, but the PS3 version also got indefinitely delayed, and they lost that precious, precious subscription money that is vital to the success of all large-scale MMORPGs. Running a full-fledged MMO for nine months costs a ton of money, and when you're not getting the subscription fees you were banking on, well, here comes trouble. Bored of Arcana
But the rabite hole goes deeper than Final Fantasy XIV. Remember Lord of Arcana? Me neither. Monster Hunter has been enjoying phenomenal success, and Square Enix wanted a piece of Capcom's pie. But Lord of Arcana was an unoriginal, unpolished, un-fun experience. Why? Well, like a certain Square Enix property would urge us, let's look upon the heart. ![]() Namco Bandai saw what Capcom was doing and tried to do it better (whether they did is purely subjective, but hey), and for that, they got rewarded with a successful and well-liked franchise. Namco Bandai saw a great game and said, "I'll bet we could make something people would love." Square Enix, however, saw that game and said, "I'll bet we could make something people would buy." That kind of business gets noticed.
Comments
Post a Comment
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this article.
|
|
| More On GameRevolution | |
Doc_Holliday
Joined: Nov 2005
I love this question. It reflects the sheer madness that currently exists within many top Japanese game developers.
When a company is sitting as comfortably as SE, why would you rush your next massive product? I'd like to see their entire executive staff hanged in effigy.
zero_traveler
Joined: Mar 2012
FFVII remake? One of the higherups needed to do such a thing basically said he doesn't feel like it.
Kingdom Hearts? Theres a few things they could do there... how about...oh, Maybe bringing the Final Mixes out of Japan? Seriously? ALL of the final mix versions of the KH games have ADDITIONAL SCENES AND KEY STORYLINE INFORMATION THAT ISN'T ANYWHERE ELSE.
Kingdom hearts again: Just putting the games on the PSN would be great.
For the last several years, I've been convinced they just don't like making money. For some strange reason.
213EDD
Joined: Sep 2007
Odbarc
Joined: Apr 2007
Ranim
Joined: Nov 2005
MrrClean
Joined: Aug 2010
SweetHat
Joined: May 2011
sandineyes
Joined: May 2008
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
Some loser.
Kese_Arcade
Joined: May 2011
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
Some loser.
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
Man I really am a loser.
danielrbischoff
Joined: Nov 2009
SweetHat
Joined: May 2011
quiknkold
Joined: May 2011
New Line did it with the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, a gigantic gamble that paid off big time.
but Squenix dosent have to gamble. they know what we want, and they know if they did it, we would buy it. I'm talking about the Final Fantasy 7 Remake!
quiknkold
Joined: May 2011
Sammo
Joined: Oct 2005
I was so frustrated with FFXIII that I wrote a blog about it but then I never put it up because I felt like too much of a dork.
Klandathu
Joined: Apr 2008
Heath_Hindman
Joined: May 2011
That IS a popular opinion. Lots of people hated that one, and it's only serving to shake up confidence in the Square Enix name.
cyberjim2000
Joined: Feb 2010
Rinnon
Joined: Nov 2005
The thing is, I don't know about you guys, but I bought it. Which to Squenix is all they wanted. I don't think they cared if I finished it, as long as I bought it. But I won't be making that mistake again. And I suspect a lot of people feel that way. XIII-2 isn't getting a day 1 buy. It's getting a "read the reviews" + "Wait for it used" treatment. And that's only IF it's an actual improvement over XIII and not just "Oh well, people bought XIII so they must like it! Let's just make the same general game, with a new story."
WickedLiquid
Joined: Mar 2009
And I agree about remaking the classics. There's a whole new generation of kids out there who never got to experience the golden era of gaming in the 90's. Although considering the shocking decline in quality from SquareEnix, I wouldn't be surprised if they somehow managed to screw it up and Squall's voice actor was a 10 yr old boy.
DaVillain
Joined: Apr 2011
DaVillain
Joined: Apr 2011
Krenseru
Joined: Nov 2011
I honestly hope this company does crumble.
wvtn
Joined: Nov 2011
That being said, I have played the older Final Fantasy games, I've finished 1,2,7,8,9,10,10-2,13, and tactics. 7 is still my favorite, but I don't think some of you are giving 13 as much credit as it deserves.
meap
Joined: Dec 2011
That aside, it somewhat fails as an FF game.
Tristam
Joined: Dec 2011
Yukipon
Joined: Jan 2012
Sadly that's what you get what you get when you have a former securities salesman in the hot seat.
I guess he's trying to drive down the sales of the SE shares to the ground so that the Chinese may find it attractive to buy it out (and continue the development of FFXIV)
CaptainGame
Joined: Jul 2012
Capcom would be another one. They seem to utterly refuse to deliver what their customers want.
Peteguy777
Joined: Jan 2013
Also yes that is also True about Capcom, which is sad since I grew up loving MegaMan as well.
nick_olsen
Joined: Apr 2013