Half-man, half-amazing game. Review

Half-man, half-amazing game.

Sports game endorsements are guided purely by here-and-now fame. Usually it’s

fine because most megastars wind up as legends, but every once in a while, a game

company latches on to a fly-by-night success story, slaps his or her face on the

box cover, sends out a bazillion press releases announcing the deal, and figures

that the famous mug alone will sell a half-million copies.

Then

it turns out that Buster

Douglas
is a chump. D’oh!

But in the case of NBA Inside Drive 2002, Microsoft showed some brains

when they went with Vince Carter, arguably the most exciting player in the league.

They also showed some skills with the rock in this decent if unspectacular entry

into the Xbox b-ball scene. It’s just too bad it doesn’t have NBA

2K2
‘s A.I….and I don’t mean Allen Iverson on the cover.

The Inside Drive series started on the PC, but this version is built

very much from the ground up with Xbox playability and power in mind. The game

features all 29 NBA teams, complete with rosters updated in November 2001. Nice.

Sometimes it pays to be a little late.

The trimmings, though, are a little thin. You can play in Exhibition, Season,

or Playoff modes. That’s it. No One on One mode, no Three Point Contest, no

“Street” mode – it’s just the bare necessities. I suppose that’s not really

such a bad thing, since the extra modes in other games are often bland afterthoughts.

Still, it would have been nice to see the same care taken with this as with

Microsoft’s other big sports title NFL Fever,

which at least featured a bunch of Fantasy teams to play against and unlock.

Though the garnish is light, the entrée is adequate. The gameplay in Inside

Drive 2002
is pretty solid. Teams don’t really follow their real-life tendencies

as well as in NBA 2K2, but the game makes up for its somewhat unimaginative

AI with its excellent control options.

Typical moves like stealing, blocking and box-out stance are of course in

here, but so are nice touches like a ‘take a charge’ button, which sometimes

actually works. Deke moves aren’t simply spins and behind the back dribbles.

You can jab step, fake passes, bust out crossovers or even lose defenders with

a hesitation dribble. Playing in the paint also carries some new additions like

step-out moves, Karl Malone style. It isn’t all hook shots down there, you know.

To complement the in-game action, Microsoft obviously spent some time thinking about ways to better the coaching aspect. The result is a real-time coaching option that lets you change strategies without having to sort through options screens. Just use the D-pad to scroll through a small onscreen side menu to choose plays, switch up the team defense and defensive pressure, and even change tempos on the fly. It’s very handy and helps the game flow smoothly.

For the most part the gameplay is fine. Scores tend to be just about right

and when the action gets going it has a good feel. Still, there are some problems

here that are hard to ignore.

First and foremost is the propensity of blocked shots. I racked up 30 blocks

in my first outing set on 8 minute quarters. That’s about 20 too many. The second

time around I upped the difficulty and racked up a marginally less disturbing

26 blocks. Guys who have no business swatting the ball, like Laker point guard

Derek Fisher, act like Mark

Eaton
. It’s silly.

Which

is also a good way to describe the AI – it ain’t great. Computer players don’t

react much like their real-life counterparts and don’t often run convincing

plays. The only real sign of intellect at work is towards the end of the game,

when the CPU will intentionally foul or bomb three pointers if it’s losing.

The delivery of the game is mixed; up close, players look fine (particularly

their faces), but you don’t play basketball games from eye level. The players

look doughy and a little awkward at the farther zooms, and though the animations

are terrific, the overall look is reminiscent of 32-bit basketball rather than

next-generation stuff, due in part to the crowd being made up of cheap-looking

sprite animations. The ball also tends to float in the air too much due to some

questionable physics, particularly during passes.

The play-by-play is not good, despite the veteran team of Kevin Calabro and

Marques Johnson. Marques blabs on and on about all sorts of stupid non-factoids

while Kevin is rife with hyperbole, constantly carrying on over the most basic

dunk. Both are repetitive and annoying and thank god for the options menu. Bob

Costas, where art though?

Oddly, there is no Custom player feature, so don’t even think about putting yourself in the game. Again, this is a very bare bones piece of software.

But not an inherently bad one. NBA Inside Drive 2002 may not have the

thoroughness of other b-ball titles, but it’s certainly not an airball. At least

it’s better than NBA Live 2002. Still, I wouldn’t

necessarily run out and buy it considering that a port of NBA 2K2 is

right around the corner.





  • In-game coaching
  • Good moves/control
  • Great animations
  • Bad commentary
  • Very bare bones
  • No Player Creator?

6

Upcoming Releases
In-game coaching Good moves/control Great animations Bad commentary Very bare bones No Player Creator?
In-game coaching Good moves/control Great animations Bad commentary Very bare bones No Player Creator?
In-game coaching Good moves/control Great animations Bad commentary Very bare bones No Player Creator?
Reviews
9 REDMAGIC 10 Pro Review
With a new Snapdragon processor comes a new REDMAGIC 10 Pro phone incorporating it. For those gamers or power users…
X