More Reviews
REVIEWS Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D Review
Gamers have gone bananas for Nintendo's 3DS, but can this port of Retro Studios' 2010 Wii game make the jump to your portable?

Pandora's Tower Review
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but swords and chains excite me. Should you climb the towers in Xseed's JRPG/adventure hybrid to save your cursed (and tragically whiny) girlfriend?
More Previews
PREVIEWS The Last of Us Preview
With Naughty Dog releasing a new IP in just a few short weeks, we got hands-on one more time. But don't worry: This is a spoiler-free preview.
Release Dates
NEW RELEASES GRiD 2
Release date: 05/28/13

Fuse
Release date: 05/28/13

Remember Me
Release date: 06/04/13

The Last of Us
Release date: 06/14/13


LATEST FEATURES Xbox Infinity: Everything (We Think) We Know About Microsoft's Next-Gen Console [Updated... Again]
Microsoft is pulling back the curtain on their next-gen gaming box tomorrow. Here's an updated look at what we're expecting to see.

GR Showdown: Are There Way Too Many Remakes And Reboots?
Gamers continually complain about the lack of innovation from publishers and developers, but in this tough economy, it would seem that sequels and remakes are their bread and butter. Are there not enough new IPs?
MOST POPULAR FEATURES 7 Best Video Game Franchises Of All Time
Gaming is home to some incredible IPs. Here you'll find a slightly objective, yet heavily biased, list of the absolute best of the best.
 
Coming Soon

LEADERBOARD
Read More Member Blogs
FEATURED VOXPOP nick_olsen
Welcome home, Mario; we’ve missed you!
By nick_olsen
Posted on 05/13/13
[ Editor's Note: As Nick Olsen is a writer for Theory of Gaming, this won't be counted in the monthly Vox Pop prize. However, it is very much a worthy read. ] By Nick Olsen Co-founder, Theory of Gaming In 1985 Nintendo started a revolution when it...

Return to Castle Wolfenstein Review

Johnny_B By:
Johnny_B
12/01/01
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION
EMAIL TO A FRIEND
GENRE Action 
PLAYERS 00 
PUBLISHER Activision 
DEVELOPER  
RELEASE DATE  
MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
M Contains Blood and Gore, Violence

What do these ratings mean?

Sprechen Sie Zombie?

Some things in life are just perversely ironic. Take this one: when I was growing up as a nice Jewish boy in California, I had a recurring fantasy that I could go back in time as the Terminator and kill Hitler, piss on Himmler, and give Albert Spear a Canadian necktie. I eventually came to think that perhaps conflating the MTV-generation's stout unwillingness to accept reality with a healthy dose of 1980's paranoid action fantasies and Michael J. Fox films was not altogether healthy.

As this moment of awakening was upon me and I opened my soul to living in truth, my brother raced into the room and grabbed me off the couch to show me this new game he got. Minutes later, I was blasting away Nazis with the glee of a Stormtrooper-massacring Ewok. That was Wolfenstein 3D, the very first of the first-person shooters.

That was a very long time ago. But it seems that someone else realized that power of nostalgia because they went ahead and finally made a sequel to Wolfenstein 3D, the aptly titled Return to Castle Wolfenstein. What we're dealing with is a good game, a fun game, but strangely a game that, though conceived of nostalgia, doesn't have any real sense of where it came from.

You reprise your role as agent BJ Blazkowicz, sent deep into Germany on some wily scheme by a secretive council of Allied spooks. The alleged plot concerns a Nazi attempt to resurrect an ancient, evil German warlord-sorcerer-blend-o-matic-something. Throughout the game, BJ blasts Nazis, Occult Nazis, Robo Nazis, and even Mummy-Robo-Mutant-Brainfeeding-Clawed-Nazis-With-Poor-Hygeine. This poses a small problem.

Who cares, right? It's a shooter, there are targets, you shoot them, they die, you dance, right? But games are trying more and more to feel like action movies, and movies need good plots...and games need at least buyable ones. Shooting Robocop's grandad in 1944 and eviscerating the Evil Dead during WWII tends to take a player out of their willing suspension of disbelief.

Worse still, Return to Castle Wolfenstein introduces a supernatural evil that is meant to be even worse than the Nazis. The Nazis are the ultimate evil, and making them less vile than anything detracts from their impact and therefore from the fun of shooting them.

Speaking of which, they don't die like they used to. Mention "Mein Lieben!" to any self-respecting PC gamer and you'll get a knowing smile - that's what Nazis screamed as you killed them in Wolf 3D. Here, they speak English. I understand that for story purposes the Nazis often have long conversations that have to be in English, but why extend it over a beloved gaming hallmark? This is the main problem with Return to Castle Wolfenstein - it's so excited about the ways that is differs from Wolf3D that it sacrifices its connection to its past.

But before you get depressed, know that Return to Castle Wolfenstein is not bad; actually, it's mostly solid. If you forget about most of the intangibles, the game does a damn good job of putting you somewhere with a gun and letting it all rip. The graphics (based on Quake 3 tech) are extremely good, easily on the bleeding edge, and the level design is detailed and atmospheric. The weapon selection is good as well, with most of the guns being true to the period except for the Tesla cannon...oh well... it worked for Red Alert.

Above all, Return to Castle Wolfenstein has the right feel as a shooter. The combat is very solid with smart enemy placement and AI that, while not exceptional, makes for some great gunplay. Most of the time, Return to Castle Wolfenstein is much like a stripped-down No One Lives Forever set in WWII and, when it concentrates on being that, succeeds very well.

What really makes it work, though, is the multiplayer. Instead of the usual Deathmatch options, Return to Castle Wolfenstein offers a team-based multiplayer game best described as the meeting of Unreal Tournament's Assault mode and Half-Life's Team Fortress. Two teams, Allied and Axis, square off around a fortress, town, or other installation and each have objectives, usually more complicated than just attack/defend. Each player picks a role, either a Soldier (can use any weapon), Medic (can heal dying soldiers), Engineer (can blow up obstacles), or Lieutenant (carries ammo and can call airstrikes). Once you select your role and your weapon, you spawn in with that weapon and keep it unless you die and switch.

This system allows some very intricate strategizing and teamwork. The best games involve a great deal of communication and coordination; the worst ones are free-for-all chaos, which is still good fun. The single player and multiplayer were designed by different developers (Gray Matter and Nerve, respectively), so there isn't a lot of cohesion, but neither is hobbled by the other. The multiplayer alone is worth the price of admission.

But in all, Return to Castle Wolfenstein is not what it could have been. As a story it's utterly bizarre, as a sequel it's sub-par, but as a stand-alone game it's very good. The simple truth is that regardless of the detractions, killing Nazis will always be fun...always. There are few times that you can play a game and feel you made the world a better place. Wolfenstein 3D was one of those times. If the world isn't any better after playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein, at least it might brighten your day.


B Revolution report card
  • Killing Nazis!
  • Killing More Nazis!
  • Great Graphics
  • Multiplayer for the ages
  • Killing Zombie Nazis?
  • Great Looking Zombie Nazis?
  • Story for the trash can
    Reviews by other members
    No member reviews for the game.

More from the Game Revolution Network




Comments
  • imabot
    imabot

    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posted: Feb 17th, 2012 at 1:46 pm
    I see a review here that smacks of emotional compromise...
    If this game were like the original, it would have, simply put, sucked. The original is not a good game. T'was groundbreaking at the time, but that's about it.
    I can understand that, being Jewish, you'd be content with level after level of shooting down legions of Germans, some of them 16 years old and drafted into the wehrmacht against their will, but some will find that boring.
    The game is good enough to keep you going until the end; however, below the surface it feels a bit anaemic to me. The levels outside the castle suffer from being too linear, the village being the ultimate disappointment. Many of the standard, military operation levels felt a tad boring compared to those that featured the supernatural elements. The manual also misguides one into thinking that there will be many different, exciting monsters lurking in the dark corners of maze-like laboratories. I can remember only ever encountering one such monster. Very disappointing.
    I don't agree with you on the Nazis being the ultimate evil. Being a non-Jewish Dutch South African, there was no threat in a possible German victory for me, especially since Hitler was fond of the us. A supernatural army that could go out of control and destroy the whole world, including me, is a greater evil than the nazis - to me.
    I agree somewhat with the criticism that the German soldiers speak English and not German, but I don't really care. German and my own language being very similar, hearing Teutonic cries of pain wasn't an abnormally interesting experience.
    Lastly, could you reviewers stop saying things like "on the plus side, you get to kill loads of nazis?" It's just obnoxious. Half of you probably don't even know what a nazi was.

    a B or even a B- is an accurate score, though i disagree with your reasons for giving the score.

Post a Comment
LOGIN or REGISTER to post a comment or rate this article.

Click here for another Return to Castle Wolfenstein review
 


More information about Return to Castle Wolfenstein


More On GameRevolution